Pashupatinath restricts entry on a basis that is unusual even among restrictive temples, and it has litigated the question of who chooses its priests up to the Supreme Court of Nepal.
The rule at the gate
Entry to the main courtyard is permitted to practising Hindus of South Asian origin, and to Nepali and Tibetan Buddhists. Converts to Hinduism who are not of South Asian descent are refused.
This is worth stating precisely because it is not a religious test. A person may be a practising Hindu, initiated, observant, and still be turned away on the basis of ancestry. The rule is set by the Pashupati Area Development Trust and enforced at the gate by Nepal's Armed Police Force.
Everyone else views the temple from the far bank of the Bagmati, which is why almost every photograph of Pashupatinath is taken across a river, and why almost every one of them also contains a cremation.
The cremation ghats
The ghats below the temple are in continuous use. Cremations are conducted in full view of the opposite bank, which is public, accessible, and generally crowded with visitors and cameras. Families burn their dead a few dozen metres from tourists photographing them.
The priests, and the case
The Bhatta priests who serve the main shrine are traditionally Kannada-speaking Brahmin scholars brought from Karnataka, selected on scholarly qualification rather than inheriting the post. The practice is held to descend from Shankara, and it means the principal temple of Nepal has been served for centuries by South Indian priests.
In 2009 a Maoist-led government appointed Nepali priests instead, bypassing the traditional selection. The move was defended as ending a colonial-style dependence on India and asserting Nepali control over a Nepali shrine; it was attacked as a political seizure of a religious appointment.
Protests followed, and litigation. The Supreme Court of Nepal overruled the appointments, and the government at first declined to comply.
The episode is a clean example of a collision that recurs across this atlas: a state's claim to appoint against an institution's claim to select. At Pashupatinath the institution won, and it took a court to make that stick.