Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sacred Sites

Skara Brae and the Heart of Neolithic Orkney

Prehistoric Sites

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

Origin 3200 BCE to 2200 BCE

Skara Brae is a Neolithic village on the Bay of Skaill in Orkney, occupied between about 3180 and 2500 BC, its houses sunk into midden and fitted with stone furniture (hearths, box beds, a shelved dresser), which survives because Orkney sandstone splits into slabs and the islands had almost no timber. It is a settlement and not a sanctuary; nothing excavated there identifies a deity, a priesthood or a building set apart. Its religious interest lies a few miles inland, where the Stones of Stenness, the Ring of Brodgar, the large complex on the Ness of Brodgar and the chambered cairn of Maeshowe stand within sight of one another. Maeshowe is built so that for some days around midwinter the light of the setting sun travels the length of the entrance passage and falls on the back wall of the chamber.

Facts
Geography
Latitude
59 degrees north 2
Approximate reference point, rounded to one decimal place; this marks the site's general location for a map, not a survey-grade or precise boundary measurement.
Longitude
3.3 degrees west 2
Approximate reference point, rounded to one decimal place; this marks the site's general location for a map, not a survey-grade or precise boundary measurement.
Site
Type of Site
Megalithic monument 1
Type of Site Detail
Neolithic settlement on Orkney beside a nearby ceremonial monument complex of standing stone circles and a chambered cairn aligned to the midwinter sun. 2
Attributions
Tradition
Prehistoric 1
Origins
Origin Period
3200 BCE to 2200 BCE 1
Country
United Kingdom 1
Region
British Isles and Gaul 1
Status
Status Today
Standing, but maintained as a museum or heritage monument 1
UNESCO World Heritage
Inscribed on the World Heritage List 3
Heart of Neolithic Orkney, inscribed 1999
Location
Location of Skara Brae and the Heart of Neolithic Orkney Afghanistan Albania Algeria Angola Argentina Armenia Australia Austria Azerbaijan Bahrain Bangladesh Barbados Belarus Belgium Benin Bhutan Bolivia Bosnia and Herzegovina Botswana Brazil Bulgaria Burkina Faso Burundi Cabo Verde Cambodia Cameroon Canada Chile China Colombia Costa Rica Croatia Cuba Cyprus Czech Republic Democratic Republic of the Congo Denmark Dominican Republic Ecuador Egypt El Salvador Estonia Eswatini Ethiopia Federated States of Micronesia Fiji Finland France French Polynesia Gabon Georgia Germany Ghana Greece Guam Guatemala Haiti Honduras Hong Kong Hungary Iceland India Indonesia Iran Iraq Ireland Israel Italy Ivory Coast Jamaica Japan Jordan Kazakhstan Kenya Kuwait Laos Latvia Lebanon Libya Lithuania Madagascar Malawi Malaysia Mali Malta Mauritius Mexico Moldova Mongolia Morocco Mozambique Myanmar Namibia Nepal Netherlands New Zealand Nigeria North Macedonia Norway Oman Pakistan Palestine Panama Papua New Guinea Paraguay Peru Philippines Poland Portugal Puerto Rico Qatar Romania Russia Rwanda Saint Vincent and the Grenadines Samoa Saudi Arabia Senegal Serbia Sierra Leone Singapore Slovakia Slovenia Solomon Islands South Africa South Korea South Sudan Spain Sri Lanka Sudan Suriname Sweden Switzerland Syria Taiwan Tanzania Thailand Tonga Trinidad and Tobago Tunisia Turkey Uganda Ukraine United Arab Emirates United Kingdom United States Uruguay Uzbekistan Vanuatu Vatican City Venezuela Vietnam Yemen Zambia Zimbabwe
Learn More
Childe's Date, and What Radiocarbon Did to It

Skara Brae is the best lesson in archaeological humility in Britain, and the lesson is about confidence rather than about religion.

A storm stripped the turf from the knoll at the Bay of Skaill in 1850 and the landowner, William Watt, dug into what it exposed, stopping in 1868. V. Gordon Childe, among the most influential prehistorians of the twentieth century, excavated around 1930 and concluded the village dated to roughly 500 BC. Radiocarbon dating in the early 1970s put the occupation between about 3180 and 2500 BC. He was wrong by some twenty-seven centuries, working carefully, with the best comparative method available, and in good faith. Every confident functional claim about a prehistoric site should be read with that number in mind.

The village itself is a settlement and not a sanctuary, and this entry says so because it is regularly presented otherwise. Eight houses were sunk into midden for insulation and linked by covered passages, each with a central hearth, box beds and a shelved stone dresser facing the door. The furniture survives because Orkney sandstone splits into usable slabs and the islands had almost no timber, so what would elsewhere have been wooden is stone. Nothing excavated there identifies a deity, a priesthood, or a building set apart for worship.

The religious weight of Neolithic Orkney sits a few miles inland, in a landscape where the Stones of Stenness, the Ring of Brodgar, the large complex on the Ness of Brodgar and the chambered cairn of Maeshowe stand within sight of one another between two lochs. Maeshowe is the one with an unambiguous alignment: it is built so that for some days around the midwinter solstice the light of the setting sun travels the length of the entrance passage and falls on the rear wall of the chamber.

Maeshowe also carries the best graffiti in northern Europe. Norsemen broke into it in the twelfth century and cut more than thirty runic inscriptions into the walls, the largest such collection anywhere from a single site. They are boasts, names, a claim about treasure carried off, and remarks about women. There is nothing liturgical in them, which is itself informative about what a Norse raiding party thought it had walked into. The chamber was opened again in 1861 by the antiquarian James Farrer, who came in through the roof and emptied it.

Two cautions. The Ness of Brodgar, excavated from 2003 to 2024, is routinely called a temple complex in press coverage; its excavators have not claimed that. And the standing threat to Skara Brae is the sea, an assessment in 2019 warned that a single severe storm could remove part of it.

Furniture That Never Rotted Away

Skara Brae's stone furniture survived because sand buried it for thousands of years, and a storm is what finally gave it back.

Furniture that never rotted away

Because timber was scarce on Neolithic Orkney, the settlement's inhabitants built dressers, box beds and hearths directly from stone slabs rather than wood, and because the entire village was subsequently buried and sealed under sand, these stone furnishings survived intact in a way that wooden furniture at almost any comparable Neolithic site elsewhere would not have, giving Skara Brae an unusually direct, readable domestic layout.

Uncovered by a storm

A severe storm in 1850 stripped away the sand and turf that had covered the site for millennia, exposing part of the settlement's structure to the local landowner, who began early excavation shortly afterward, meaning the site's rediscovery came from weather rather than any deliberate archaeological search for it.

A date pushed back by better science

As this entry's companion article notes, the site's original chronology, proposed by the archaeologist Vere Gordon Childe, was substantially revised once radiocarbon dating became available, pushing the settlement's occupation earlier than Childe had estimated and repositioning Skara Brae's place within the wider timeline of Neolithic Orkney's monuments.

Cross-Tradition Connections

Contained In

Related To

Both belong to the Neolithic of the Scottish isles, one a settlement and one a stone setting.

Sources
1. Astronomy in Prehistoric Britain and Ireland
Clive Ruggles, Yale University Press, 1999from the site's own catalogue recordView the Source
2. Encyclopaedia Britannica (online academic reference)
Encyclopaedia Britannica editors, Encyclopaedia Britannica, Inc., 2024View the Source
3. UNESCO World Heritage List
United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization, UNESCO World Heritage CentreView the Source
Heart of Neolithic Orkney, UNESCO World Heritage List
UNESCO World Heritage Centre, UNESCO, 1999The four componentsView the Source
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

Choose a year to see this entry's facts and connections as the atlas records them at that moment: what it held then, what it held instead, and what it had not yet adopted. Choose Present for the current record.