Origin from 1936
The construction of a representative sample and validated questionnaire so limited responses can be generalized to a wider population, demonstrated decisively by George Gallup's correct 1936 election prediction. Determines whether a cited religious survey's headline number means what it is reported to mean.
Facts
Method
Methodconstruction of a representative sample and a validated questionnaire, so that responses from a limited number of people can be generalized to a wider population within a stated margin of error 2 Identity
Field Category Parent Field Origins
Emerged As Named Discipline Subject
Subjecthow a poll or survey's sample was drawn and its questions worded, and what that means for how far its results can be generalized 2 Learn More
Gallup Predicts an Election by Asking Fewer People, Correctly
Survey methodology is the discipline of constructing a representative sample and a validated questionnaire so that responses collected from a limited number of people can be generalized, within a stated margin of error, to a much larger population. The American pollster George Gallup demonstrated the method's power in 1936, correctly predicting Franklin Roosevelt's re-election using a scientifically selected sample of a few thousand respondents, a result that stood in sharp and widely publicized contrast to a national magazine's poll of ten million respondents, drawn from an unrepresentative sample, which predicted the opposite winner and got it wrong.
Most of what is publicly known about how many people hold a given religious belief, attend a given service or identify with a given tradition comes from surveys, and survey methodology is what determines whether a given poll's headline number actually means what it is reported to mean, how the sample was drawn, how the question was worded, and what margin of error surrounds the result. The atlas checks a cited religious survey's methodology before repeating its figures, since two surveys asking superficially similar questions with different wording or sampling can produce very different, equally publicized numbers.
Connections
Branch Of
Source Frascati Manual 2015: Guidelines for Collecting and Reporting Data on Research and Experimental DevelopmentOECD
Open Questions Needing This
Source Report on the Census of HallucinationsHenry Sidgwick, Eleanor Sidgwick, Frederic W. H. Myers, Frank Podmore, Alice Johnson
Sources
1. Frascati Manual 2015: Guidelines for Collecting and Reporting Data on Research and Experimental Development
2. Survey Methodology
Robert M. Groves, Floyd J. Fowler Jr., Mick P. Couper, James M. Lepkowski, Eleanor Singer and Roger Tourangeau, Wiley, 2009
Divinity Atlas Scholarly Discipline Register
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.
View At A Past Year
Choose a year to see this entry's facts and connections as the atlas records them at that moment: what it held then, what it held instead, and what it had not yet adopted. Choose Present for the current record.