Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sign In
Text size
100%
Theme
Scripts & Magical Alphabets

Ugaritic

Semitic Script Family
Origin Attested in tablets from roughly the fourteenth century BCE until the destruction of Ugarit early in the twelfth century BCE, in the collapse that ended the Bronze Age across the eastern Mediterranean.

Ugaritic is a cuneiform alphabet of thirty signs, pressed into clay with a wedge-tipped stylus in the same physical technique as Mesopotamian cuneiform but sharing none of its sign shapes and none of its principle: each Ugaritic sign stands for one consonant (three of them mark a glottal stop against a different following vowel), not for a syllable or a word. It was used at the city of Ugarit, on the Syrian coast, to write the Northwest Semitic language also called Ugaritic, and it survives only in tablets excavated at that site from 1929 onward, running from roughly the fourteenth century BCE to the city's destruction early in the twelfth. A school tablet from the site preserves the thirty signs in a fixed order close to the sequence later used for Hebrew and Phoenician, which makes it the earliest attested alphabetic order known anywhere. The script died with the city it served and has no descendants.

Facts
Origins
Origin Period
Attested in tablets from roughly the fourteenth century BCE until the destruction of Ugarit early in the twelfth century BCE, in the collapse that ended the Bronze Age across the eastern Mediterranean. 1
Place of Origin
Ugarit, modern Ras Shamra, on the Syrian coast. 1
Identity
Script Type
A consonantal alphabet in cuneiform wedge shapes: every ordinary sign is a single consonant, and three signs additionally mark the vowel quality carried on the glottal stop (a, i and u), which is more vowel marking than a true abjad but short of a full vowel-writing alphabet. 1
Attributions
Tradition
An alphabetic cuneiform script used to write the Ugaritic language at the city of Ugarit, recording some of the earliest known texts of Canaanite mythology. 1
Script type (class)
Abjad 1
Connections

Associated With

This source names Mesopotamians directly: "Ugaritic is a cuneiform alphabet of thirty signs, pressed into clay with a wedge-tipped stylus in the same physical technique as Mesopotamian cuneiform but sharing none of its sign shapes and none..."

Source The World's Writing SystemsPeter T. Daniels and William Bright (eds.)
Phoenicians, Cultures

This source names Phoenicians directly: "Ugaritic is a cuneiform alphabet of thirty signs, pressed into clay with a wedge-tipped stylus in the same physical technique as Mesopotamian cuneiform but sharing none of its sign shapes and none..."

Source The World's Writing SystemsPeter T. Daniels and William Bright (eds.)
Ugarit, Cities

This source names Ugarit directly: "Ugaritic is a cuneiform alphabet of thirty signs, pressed into clay with a wedge-tipped stylus in the same physical technique as Mesopotamian cuneiform but sharing none of its sign shapes and none..."

Source The World's Writing SystemsPeter T. Daniels and William Bright (eds.)

Contains

Ayin, Alphabet Letters
Beth, Alphabet Letters
Dhal, Alphabet Letters
He, Alphabet Letters
Heth, Alphabet Letters
Kaph, Alphabet Letters
Kha, Alphabet Letters
Mem, Alphabet Letters
Nun, Alphabet Letters
Pe, Alphabet Letters
Qoph, Alphabet Letters
Resh, Alphabet Letters
S2, Alphabet Letters
Sade, Alphabet Letters
Shin, Alphabet Letters
Taw, Alphabet Letters
Teth, Alphabet Letters
Tha, Alphabet Letters
Waw, Alphabet Letters
Yod, Alphabet Letters
Za, Alphabet Letters

Originates in Language

Ugaritic, Languages

The Ugaritic cuneiform alphabet was devised to write the Ugaritic language and is attested nowhere else.

Source The World's Writing SystemsPeter T. Daniels and William Bright (eds.)
Sources
1. The World's Writing Systems
Peter T. Daniels and William Bright (eds.), Oxford University Press, 1996the chapter on the Ugaritic scriptView the Source

Take a Related Quiz

Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.