Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sign In
Text size
100%
Theme
Source

A Glitch in the Matrix (2021 documentary) (Wikipedia)

Wikipedia

Wikipedia's community maintained article on A Glitch in the Matrix carries no named author or peer review process behind any given version of the page, and is continuously subject to further editing. Its strength is that it gathers, with citations, the 2021 Rodney Ascher documentary's production and reception facts, its Sundance premiere, Magnolia Pictures release, its avatar interview format, and its Rotten Tomatoes and Metacritic aggregate scores. Its limit is that a specialist or contested claim about simulation theory itself, rather than the documentary about it, should be checked against dedicated philosophical or religious studies scholarship rather than resting on this page alone. This description is adapted from Wikipedia contributors under CC BY-SA 4.0; changes were made. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/

Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier
3
Wikipedia's community maintained article on A Glitch in the Matrix is a continuously revised tertiary encyclopedia entry with no named author or peer review process, hence the lower tier, though useful for the documentary's cited production and reception facts.
Notes
Encyclopedic production and reception facts for the 2021 Rodney Ascher documentary: Sundance premiere, Magnolia Pictures release, avatar-interview format, and Rotten Tomatoes and Metacritic aggregate scores.
Citation
Author
Wikipedia contributors
Publisher
Wikipedia
Publication Year
2026
URL
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A_Glitch_in_the_Matrix
Source Type
encyclopedia
Claims Backed By This Source (19 claims)

This source backs 19 claims across the atlas. As facts: 16 well-attested. As cited relationships: 2 connected. Plus 1 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.

Disposition By Topic

  • Screen Works, 10 claims: 7 well-attested, 2 connected, 1 general references.
  • Sources, 8 claims: 8 well-attested.
  • Articles, 1 claims: 1 well-attested.
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.