Sources
A History of Laos
Citation Formats
General Reference
APA Style
BibTeX
Martin Stuart-Fox is a historian of Southeast Asia, and this Cambridge University Press book is his standard general history of Laos, covering the country's political and religious history including the place of Buddhism within it. Its strength is that it is a broad, well-regarded scholarly synthesis widely used as the standard English-language reference for Lao history. Its limit is exactly that breadth, as a general national history it treats religious institutions and events as part of a wider political narrative rather than in specialist depth, so a claim needing detailed analysis of a specific Lao Buddhist institution or practice is better served by a source focused on that subject specifically.
Facts
Citation
AuthorMartin Stuart-Fox
PublisherCambridge University Press
Publication Year1997
Source Typeacademic monograph
Assessment
Reliability Tier1
Published by Cambridge University Press as Martin Stuart-Fox's academic history of Laos, peer reviewed university press scholarship. NotesGeneral history of Laos.
Cross-Tradition Connections
Associated With
This source names Asia directly: "Stuart-Fox is a historian of Southeast Asia, and this Cambridge University Press book is his standard general history of Laos, covering the country's political and religious history including the..."
This source names Laos directly: "is his standard general history of Laos, covering the country's political and religious history including the place of Buddhism within it."
Claims Backed By This Source (34 claims)
This source backs 34 claims across the atlas. As facts: 24 well-attested, 3 scholarly debate. As cited relationships: 4 holds. Plus 3 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.
Disposition By Topic
- Figures, 11 claims: 7 well-attested, 2 scholarly debate, 1 holds, 1 general references.
- Sources, 9 claims: 7 well-attested, 2 holds.
- Historical Figures, 6 claims: 4 well-attested, 1 scholarly debate, 1 general references.
- Articles, 4 claims: 4 well-attested.
- Sacred Sites, 4 claims: 2 well-attested, 1 holds, 1 general references.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.
View At A Past Year
The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.