Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sign In
Text size
100%
Theme
Source

A History of Laos

Martin Stuart-Fox is a historian of Southeast Asia, and this Cambridge University Press book is his standard general history of Laos, covering the country's political and religious history including the place of Buddhism within it. Its strength is that it is a broad, well-regarded scholarly synthesis widely used as the standard English-language reference for Lao history. Its limit is exactly that breadth, as a general national history it treats religious institutions and events as part of a wider political narrative rather than in specialist depth, so a claim needing detailed analysis of a specific Lao Buddhist institution or practice is better served by a source focused on that subject specifically.

Facts
Citation
Author
Martin Stuart-Fox
Publisher
Cambridge University Press
Publication Year
1997
Source Type
academic monograph
Assessment
Reliability Tier
1
Published by Cambridge University Press as Martin Stuart-Fox's academic history of Laos, peer reviewed university press scholarship.
Notes
General history of Laos.
Connections

Associated With

Asia, Continents

This source names Asia directly: "Stuart-Fox is a historian of Southeast Asia, and this Cambridge University Press book is his standard general history of Laos, covering the country's political and religious history including the..."

Source A History of LaosMartin Stuart-Fox
Laos, Countries

This source names Laos directly: "is his standard general history of Laos, covering the country's political and religious history including the place of Buddhism within it."

Source A History of LaosMartin Stuart-Fox
Claims Backed By This Source (32 claims)

This source backs 32 claims across the atlas. As facts: 24 well-attested, 1 scholarly debate. As cited relationships: 4 holds. Plus 3 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.

Disposition By Topic

  • Figures, 9 claims: 7 well-attested, 1 holds, 1 general references.
  • Sources, 9 claims: 7 well-attested, 2 holds.
  • Historical Figures, 6 claims: 4 well-attested, 1 scholarly debate, 1 general references.
  • Articles, 4 claims: 4 well-attested.
  • Sacred Sites, 4 claims: 2 well-attested, 1 holds, 1 general references.
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.