Florian Cajori's A History of Mathematical Notations is the standard historical reference on the origin and spread of mathematical symbols, compiled by a mathematician who spent decades tracing individual notations back through primary printed sources. Its authority is that of a meticulous documentary survey rather than a single argued thesis, and its treatment of the infinity symbol is representative of its method, establishing John Wallis's 1655 introduction of the symbol as documented fact while treating proposed explanations for why Wallis chose that particular shape as conjecture rather than settled history. Its age is a real limit, since some individual attributions have been refined by later scholarship working from sources Cajori did not have access to, so a specific claim is worth confirming against a newer specialist study, but its core documentary record of who used which symbol and when remains the reference most historians of mathematics still consult first.
Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier1
Florian Cajori's A History of Mathematical Notations is the standard historical reference on mathematical symbol origins, treated at the top tier as a meticulous documentary survey still consulted first by historians of mathematics, notwithstanding that some individual attributions have since been refined by newer scholarship. NotesThe standard history of mathematical signs; the section on signs for infinity establishes Wallis 1655 and treats the proposed derivations as conjecture.
Citation
AuthorFlorian Cajori
PublisherOpen Court
Publication Year1929
Source TypeMonograph
Claims Backed By This Source (14 claims)
This source backs 14 claims across the atlas. As facts: 13 well-attested. Plus 1 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.
Disposition By Topic
- Sources, 7 claims: 7 well-attested.
- Religious Symbols, 6 claims: 5 well-attested, 1 general references.
- Articles, 1 claims: 1 well-attested.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.
View At A Past Year
The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.