Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sign In
Text size
100%
Theme
Source

Acting as a Way of Salvation: A Study of Raganuga Bhakti Sadhana

David Haberman's Acting as a Way of Salvation, Oxford University Press, 1988, is a scholarly study. Its strength is that it is a detailed academic treatment of raganuga bhakti sadhana, the devotional visualisation practice within Gaudiya Vaishnavism, drawing on the tradition's own textual sources. Its limit is the ordinary one for a single scholarly monograph on a specialist devotional practice: it presents one researcher's reading of texts that practitioners themselves may understand somewhat differently.

Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier
1
Reliability tier 1: a detailed academic monograph from Oxford University Press, drawing on the tradition's own textual sources, one researcher's reading of a specialist devotional practice.
Notes
Scholarly study of raganuga bhakti sadhana practice, Oxford University Press, 1988.
Citation
Author
David L. Haberman
Publisher
Oxford University Press
Publication Year
1988
Source Type
academic monograph
Connections

Associated With

This source names Gaudiya Vaishnavism directly: "visualisation practice within Gaudiya Vaishnavism, drawing on the tradition's own textual sources."

Source Acting as a Way of Salvation: A Study of Raganuga Bhakti SadhanaDavid L. Haberman

This source names Vaishnavism directly: "visualisation practice within Gaudiya Vaishnavism, drawing on the tradition's own textual sources."

Source Acting as a Way of Salvation: A Study of Raganuga Bhakti SadhanaDavid L. Haberman
Claims Backed By This Source (10 claims)

This source backs 10 claims across the atlas. As facts: 7 well-attested. As cited relationships: 2 holds. Plus 1 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.

Disposition By Topic

  • Sources, 9 claims: 7 well-attested, 2 holds.
  • Beliefs & Restrictions, 1 claims: 1 general references.
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.