This Wikipedia article on Adam of Bremen is a tertiary reference source summarizing what is known of the eleventh century chronicler and his Gesta Hammaburgensis Ecclesiae Pontificum, the principal surviving written source for early Scandinavian religious and political history including its account of pre-Christian Norse temple practice. Its usefulness is orienting basic biographical and bibliographic facts about a figure whose own text is the primary evidence base, drawing on the underlying scholarly debate over how reliable Adam's own secondhand and sometimes clearly polemical reporting actually is. For the finer historiographical questions about which parts of Adam's chronicle reflect eyewitness testimony versus later Christian editorializing, the specialist scholarship on Adam's sources and methods is the stronger reference.
Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier3
Reliability tier 3: a tertiary reference summary of a primary chronicler, useful for basic orientation but not for the finer historiographical questions specialist scholarship addresses. NotesWikipedia's article on Adam of Bremen. A perpetually community-edited reference page rather than a peer-reviewed publication; use for standard, uncontroversial facts about Adam of Bremen (biographical detail, dates, common definitions), not as the source for a contested or specialist scholarly claim.
Citation
AuthorWikipedia contributors
URLhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adam_of_Bremen
Source Typereference
Cross-Tradition Connections
Associated With
Adam, Figures This source names Adam directly: "This Wikipedia article on Adam of Bremen is a tertiary reference source summarizing what is known of the eleventh century chronicler and his Gesta Hammaburgensis Ecclesiae Pontificum, the principal..."
This source names Norse directly: "including its account of pre-Christian Norse temple practice."
Claims Backed By This Source (93 claims)
This source backs 93 claims across the atlas. As facts: 90 well-attested. As cited relationships: 2 holds. Plus 1 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.
Disposition By Topic
- Historical Figures, 82 claims: 81 well-attested, 1 general references.
- Sources, 8 claims: 6 well-attested, 2 holds.
- Articles, 3 claims: 3 well-attested.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.
View At A Past Year
The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.