ADL and Mel Gibson's The Passion of the Christ is the Anti-Defamation League's own published record of its concern before and after the film's release, naming the nine-scholar Jewish-Catholic committee that reviewed an early screenplay and found it likely to reinforce antisemitic readings of the Passion narrative. Its strength is that it is a named institutional source stating its own position and its own factual record of that committee's review. Its limit is that it is one advocacy organization's own account, one step below independent peer-reviewed scholarship on the film's reception.
Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier2
ADL and Mel Gibson's The Passion of the Christ, the Anti-Defamation League's own published record of its concern before and after the film's release, the middle tier reflecting a named institutional source stating its own position and its own factual record of the nine-scholar Jewish-Catholic committee that reviewed an early screenplay. Its limit is that it is one advocacy organization's own account, one step below independent peer-reviewed scholarship on the film's reception. NotesThe Anti-Defamation League's own published record of its concern before and after the film's release, naming the nine-scholar Jewish-Catholic committee that reviewed an early screenplay and found it likely to reinforce antisemitic readings of the Passion narrative. A named institutional source stating its own position, one step below independent peer-reviewed scholarship.
Citation
AuthorAnti-Defamation League
PublisherAnti-Defamation League (adl.org)
Publication Year2013
URLhttps://www.adl.org/resources/news/adl-and-mel-gibsons-passion-christ
Source TypeInstitutional
Claims Backed By This Source (12 claims)
This source backs 12 claims across the atlas. As facts: 10 well-attested. Plus 2 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.
Disposition By Topic
- Sources, 8 claims: 8 well-attested.
- Articles, 2 claims: 1 well-attested, 1 general references.
- Screen Works, 2 claims: 1 well-attested, 1 general references.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.
View At A Past Year
The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.