Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sign In
Text size
100%
Theme
Source

Agpeya (Wikipedia)

Wikipedia

Wikipedia's article on the Agpeya, the Coptic Orthodox book of hours, consulted 2026-08-12. This description is adapted from Wikipedia contributors under CC BY-SA 4.0; changes were made. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/

Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier
3
Wikipedia's article on the Agpeya, the Coptic Orthodox book of hours, the lower tier reflecting that it is a crowd sourced, not independently peer reviewed encyclopedia entry, reliable for standard identifying facts and less reliable for detailed liturgical or textual history, which a dedicated Coptic studies source would need to settle.
Notes
Wikipedia's article on the Agpeya, consulted 2026-08-12. A perpetually community-edited reference page rather than a peer-reviewed publication, useful here for the office's scriptural warrant in Psalm 119:164 and Psalm 51's recurring place across the seven hours.
Citation
Author
Wikipedia contributors
Publisher
Wikipedia
Publication Year
2026
URL
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Agpeya
Source Type
reference
Connections

Associated With

This source names Coptic Orthodox directly: "Wikipedia's article on the Agpeya, the Coptic Orthodox book of hours, consulted 2026-08-12."

Source Agpeya (Wikipedia)Wikipedia contributors
Claims Backed By This Source (15 claims)

This source backs 15 claims across the atlas. As facts: 12 well-attested. As cited relationships: 1 holds. Plus 2 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.

Disposition By Topic

  • Sources, 9 claims: 8 well-attested, 1 holds.
  • Practices, 4 claims: 3 well-attested, 1 general references.
  • Sacred Objects & Ritual Items, 2 claims: 1 well-attested, 1 general references.

Well-attested

12

Practices

Sacred Objects & Ritual Items

Holds

1

General References

2

Practices

Sacred Objects & Ritual Items

Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.