Agudath Israel of America's own statement on its official site, dated 26 June 2015, responding to the U.S. Supreme Court's ruling in Obergefell v. Hodges. States that the Torah, which forbids homosexual activity, sanctions only the union of a man and a woman in matrimony, and that the issue is not whether all human beings are created in the Divine Image or have inherent human dignity, which the statement affirms, but whether the Torah sanctions homosexual conduct or recognizes same gender unions, which it states plainly it does not.
Facts
Citation
PublisherAgudath Israel of America
Publication Year2015
URLhttps://agudah.org/statement-on-the-supreme-courts-ruling-regarding-same-sex-marriage
Source Typeorganization primary source
Assessment
Reliability Tier1
The organization's own official site stating its own position in its own words, paired with independent Orthodox Jewish journalism reporting the same statement. NotesCited for Haredi Judaism's sexuality-position and its detail.
Custodian
Custodian SourceYes
Custodian BodyAgudath Israel of America
Custodian BasisThe organization's own official site stating its own position in its own words.
Connections
Associated With
This source names Americas directly: "Agudath Israel of America's own statement on its official site, dated 26 June 2015, responding to the U.S."
Source Statement on the Supreme Court's Ruling Regarding Same Sex Marriage (Agudath Israel of America)the holders' own account
This source names Israel directly: "Agudath Israel of America's own statement on its official site, dated 26 June 2015, responding to the U.S."
Source Statement on the Supreme Court's Ruling Regarding Same Sex Marriage (Agudath Israel of America)the holders' own account
Claims Backed By This Source (14 claims)
This source backs 14 claims across the atlas. As facts: 11 well-attested. As cited relationships: 2 holds. Plus 1 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.
Disposition By Topic
- Sources, 12 claims: 10 well-attested, 2 holds.
- Denominations, 2 claims: 1 well-attested, 1 general references.
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.