Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sources

Amish Society

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

John A. Hostetler was a sociologist who was himself raised in an Amish family before leaving the community, and this Johns Hopkins University Press book, now in its fourth edition, is his standard scholarly sociological study of the Amish, including the practice of church discipline and the shunning practice called Meidung. Its strength is a rare combination, genuine insider knowledge of Amish life from his own upbringing paired with rigorous outside academic training, which is why the book remains the principal academic reference on the subject decades after its first edition. Its limit is that Amish communities themselves are not uniform, practice varies meaningfully between different Amish affiliations and settlements, so a claim about one specific community's practice of Meidung should be checked against the diversity Hostetler himself documents rather than treated as a single universal Amish rule.

Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier
1
Published by Johns Hopkins University Press as John A. Hostetler's standard academic sociological study of Amish life, peer reviewed university press scholarship.
Notes
Fourth edition of the standard sociological study of the Amish, by a scholar raised in an Amish family; the principal academic account of Meidung and church discipline.
Citation
Author
John A. Hostetler
Publisher
Johns Hopkins University Press
Publication Year
1993
Source Type
Book (scholarly)
Cross-Tradition Connections

Associated With

Amish, Denominations

This source names Amish directly: "Hostetler was a sociologist who was himself raised in an Amish family before leaving the community, and this Johns Hopkins University Press book, now in its fourth edition, is his standard scholarly..."

Source Amish SocietyJohn A. Hostetler
Claims Backed By This Source (38 claims)

This source backs 38 claims across the atlas. As facts: 24 well-attested. As cited relationships: 3 holds, 2 rejected Here. Plus 9 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.

Disposition By Topic

  • Practices, 11 claims: 10 well-attested, 1 general references.
  • Sources, 8 claims: 7 well-attested, 1 holds.
  • Doctrines, 7 claims: 2 well-attested, 2 holds, 3 general references.
  • Articles, 5 claims: 4 well-attested, 1 general references.
  • Denominations, 4 claims: 1 well-attested, 2 rejected Here, 1 general references.
  • States & Territories, 3 claims: 3 general references.
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.