Peter B. Golden is a historian of the Eurasian steppe, and this Otto Harrassowitz book is his standard academic survey of the ethnogenesis and history of the Turkic peoples, tracing their emergence and spread from the early medieval period across Central Asia and beyond. Its strength is comprehensive linguistic and historical grounding across an enormous span of peoples, languages and centuries that most single studies do not attempt to cover together, drawing on Golden's own command of the relevant primary sources in multiple languages. Its limit is that a survey working at this scale necessarily moves quickly across any one people's or period's specific history, so a claim about one particular Turkic group in one particular century is better checked against a focused study of that group than treated as fully settled by this wide angle survey alone.
Facts
Citation
AuthorPeter B. Golden
PublisherOtto Harrassowitz
Publication Year1992
URLhttps://archive.org/details/golden_202303
Source Typeacademic monograph
Assessment
Reliability Tier1
Peter Golden's standard scholarly survey of the ethnogenesis and history of the Turkic peoples, from Otto Harrassowitz. NotesStandard scholarly survey of the ethnogenesis and history of the Turkic peoples.
Connections
Associated With
This source names Asia directly: "Golden is a historian of the Eurasian steppe, and this Otto Harrassowitz book is his standard academic survey of the ethnogenesis and history of the Turkic peoples, tracing their emergence and..."
Source An Introduction to the History of the Turkic PeoplesPeter B. Golden
This source names Turkic Peoples directly: "of the ethnogenesis and history of the Turkic peoples, tracing their emergence and spread from the early medieval period across Central Asia and beyond."
Source An Introduction to the History of the Turkic PeoplesPeter B. Golden
Claims Backed By This Source (65 claims)
This source backs 65 claims across the atlas. As facts: 43 well-attested, 3 scholarly debate. As cited relationships: 8 holds, 1 connected. Plus 10 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.
Disposition By Topic
- Doctrines, 19 claims: 14 well-attested, 2 holds, 3 general references.
- Articles, 13 claims: 10 well-attested, 1 connected, 2 general references.
- Sources, 10 claims: 8 well-attested, 2 holds.
- Languages, 7 claims: 4 well-attested, 2 holds, 1 general references.
- Spread Events, 7 claims: 2 well-attested, 2 scholarly debate, 2 holds, 1 general references.
- Language Families, 5 claims: 2 well-attested, 1 scholarly debate, 2 general references.
- Cultures, 4 claims: 3 well-attested, 1 general references.
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.