Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sign In
Text size
100%
Theme
Source

Analysis of textile fragments from the 1988 radiocarbon samples of the Turin Shroud

Analysis of textile fragments from the 1988 radiocarbon samples of the Turin Shroud, Rachel Freer-Waters and A. J. Timothy Jull's 2026 paper in npj Heritage Science, examines two fragments removed as 1988 radiocarbon dating samples by the University of Arizona laboratory, comparing them against the control textiles distributed to the participating labs, and reports no evidence of contamination. Its strength is that it is a peer reviewed re-examination from a journal with a stable digital identifier, directly engaging the original sampling material rather than the dating result alone. Its limit is that it addresses sampling integrity specifically and does not itself resettle the 1988 radiocarbon date, which remains separately debated. This record's author field was corrected in this pass from the journal's own name, which had been entered as if it were the author, to the paper's real authors, confirmed against the paper's own listing on nature.com; the title, publisher, year and url were already accurate.

Facts
Citation
Author
Rachel Freer-Waters and A. J. Timothy Jull
Publisher
Springer Nature
Publication Year
2026
URL
https://www.nature.com/articles/s40494-026-02530-7
Source Type
journal
Assessment
Reliability Tier
1
Reliability tier 1: a peer reviewed re-examination in a journal with a stable digital identifier, directly engaging the original sampling material rather than the dating result alone.
Notes
Later peer-reviewed re-examination of the 1988 sample material; part of the continuing radiocarbon debate.
Connections

Associated With

Turin, Cities

This source names Turin directly: "the 1988 radiocarbon samples of the Turin Shroud, Rachel Freer-Waters and A."

Source Analysis of textile fragments from the 1988 radiocarbon samples of the Turin ShroudRachel Freer-Waters and A. J. Timothy Jull
Claims Backed By This Source (11 claims)

This source backs 11 claims across the atlas. As facts: 8 well-attested. As cited relationships: 1 holds. Plus 2 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.

Disposition By Topic

  • Sources, 9 claims: 8 well-attested, 1 holds.
  • Artifacts & Relics, 1 claims: 1 general references.
  • Cities, 1 claims: 1 general references.
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.