Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sources

Angel Prayers Oracle Cards (astrologyandangelmediums.com review, citing Hay House edition)

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

This is a review posted on astrologyandangelmediums.com of Angel Prayers Oracle Cards, created by Kyle Gray and published by Hay House in 2014, citing the Hay House edition directly. As a review by a site focused on angel and astrology practice it is a correct source for the deck's basic publication details as the reviewer confirms them against the Hay House edition. Its limit is that it is a promotional-adjacent review from within the practice community rather than an independent or scholarly assessment, so a claim needing a critical evaluation of the deck's content, rather than confirmation of its publication facts, needs a source outside this community review, and any claim about the deck's reception among readers more broadly should be checked against a wider sample of reviews than this single site.

Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier
2
A personal review blog citing the genuine Hay House edition; reliable for the deck's basic publication facts as an independently checkable review of a real commercial product, but not the publisher's own record or independent journalism, hence the middle tier.
Notes
An angel-medium review site's post on Angel Prayers Oracle Cards (Kyle Gray, Hay House, 2014), citing the Hay House edition; a promotional review, not an independent or scholarly source.
Citation
Author
Kyle Gray
Publisher
Hay House
Publication Year
2014
URL
https://www.astrologyandangelmediums.com/single-post/2018/04/02/angel-prayers-keepers-of-the-light-by-kyle-gray
Source Type
reference
Claims Backed By This Source (32 claims)

This source backs 32 claims across the atlas. As facts: 24 well-attested, 1 open question. As cited relationships: 3 holds, 1 connected. Plus 3 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.

Disposition By Topic

  • Oracle Decks, 12 claims: 7 well-attested, 1 open question, 3 holds, 1 general references.
  • Open Questions, 8 claims: 6 well-attested, 1 connected, 1 general references.
  • Sources, 8 claims: 8 well-attested.
  • Articles, 4 claims: 3 well-attested, 1 general references.
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.