Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sources

Antoine Court de Gebelin (reference article)

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

Wikipedia's article on Antoine Court de Gebelin, the eighteenth century French writer who first proposed the tarot deck held ancient Egyptian esoteric origins, is a community edited reference page rather than a peer reviewed publication. It is reliable for standard biographical facts such as his career and his 1781 publication making that claim, and less reliable for evaluating the claim itself, which modern card history scholarship has established as unsupported: the tarot's documented origin is fifteenth century Italian playing cards. Use it for basic biography; the actual history of tarot's origin needs a dedicated card history source.

Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier
3
Wikipedia's article on Antoine Court de Gebelin, who first proposed tarot held ancient Egyptian origins, the lower tier reflecting that it is a crowd sourced, not independently peer reviewed encyclopedia entry, reliable for standard biography and less reliable for evaluating the claim itself, which modern card history has established as unsupported: tarot's documented origin is fifteenth century Italian playing cards.
Notes
Wikipedia's article on Antoine Court de Gebelin. A perpetually community-edited reference page rather than a peer-reviewed publication; use for standard, uncontroversial facts about Antoine Court de Gebelin (biographical detail, dates, common definitions), not as the source for a contested or specialist scholarly claim.
Citation
Author
Wikipedia contributors
URL
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antoine_Court_de_G%C3%A9belin
Source Type
reference
Cross-Tradition Connections

Associated With

This source names Ancient Egyptians directly: "Wikipedia's article on Antoine Court de Gebelin, the eighteenth century French writer who first proposed the tarot deck held ancient Egyptian esoteric origins, is a community edited reference page..."

Source Antoine Court de Gebelin (reference article)Wikipedia contributors
Claims Backed By This Source (12 claims)

This source backs 12 claims across the atlas. As facts: 10 well-attested. As cited relationships: 1 holds. Plus 1 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.

Disposition By Topic

  • Sources, 7 claims: 6 well-attested, 1 holds.
  • Historical Figures, 4 claims: 3 well-attested, 1 general references.
  • Articles, 1 claims: 1 well-attested.
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.