Are Miraculous Gifts for Today? Four Views, edited by Wayne Grudem with contributions from Richard B. Gaffin, Robert L. Saucy, Sam Storms and Douglas A. Oss, published by Zondervan in its Counterpoints series in 1996, is a scholarly edited volume presenting four competing evangelical theological positions on continuationism and cessationism side by side, each argued by a proponent of that view with responses from the others. Its authority rests on standard academic press review and the contributors' standing as recognised theologians representing their respective positions. Its multi view format is itself the point: it represents a genuinely unresolved debate within evangelical theology rather than arguing for a single settled answer, and it should be cited accordingly.
Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier1
Are Miraculous Gifts for Today? Four Views, edited by Wayne Grudem with Richard B. Gaffin, Robert L. Saucy, Sam Storms and Douglas A. Oss, published by Zondervan in its Counterpoints series in 1996, the top tier reflecting a scholarly edited volume presenting four competing evangelical positions on continuationism and cessationism side by side, each argued by a proponent with responses from the others. Its multi view format is itself the point: it represents a genuinely unresolved debate rather than arguing for a single settled answer. NotesEdited scholarly volume presenting four theological views on whether miraculous spiritual gifts continue today.
Citation
AuthorWayne Grudem (editor), with Richard B. Gaffin, Robert L. Saucy, Sam Storms and Douglas A. Oss
PublisherZondervan, Counterpoints series
Publication Year1996
Source TypeEdited volume
Claims Backed By This Source (11 claims)
This source backs 11 claims across the atlas. As facts: 10 well-attested. Plus 1 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.
Disposition By Topic
- Sources, 7 claims: 7 well-attested.
- Articles, 4 claims: 3 well-attested, 1 general references.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.
View At A Past Year
The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.