Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sources

Asceticism

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

Vincent L. Wimbush and Richard Valantasis edited this Oxford University Press volume, an academic collection drawn from a 1993 New York conference bringing together scholars of Christian, Jewish, Muslim, Buddhist, Indian and Zoroastrian ascetic practice. Its strength is the influence of its collective argument, the volume is widely credited with displacing the older reading of asceticism as simple world denial in favor of understanding ascetic practice as the active formation of a self, a reframing that has shaped subsequent scholarship across these traditions. Its limit, as with any large edited volume, is that individual chapters vary in depth and approach by contributor and tradition, so a claim about asceticism within one specific tradition covered here is best checked against that chapter directly rather than the volume's general thesis alone.

Facts
Citation
Author
Vincent L. Wimbush and Richard Valantasis (eds.)
Publisher
Oxford University Press
Publication Year
1995
URL
https://archive.org/details/asceticism0000unse
Source Type
Edited volume
Assessment
Reliability Tier
1
A scholarly edited volume from a university press collecting Christian, Jewish, Muslim, Buddhist, Indian and Zoroastrian material on asceticism.
Notes
Papers from the 1993 New York conference; Christian, Jewish, Muslim, Buddhist, Indian and Zoroastrian material. The volume that displaced the older world-denial reading of asceticism in favour of asceticism as the formation of a self.
Cross-Tradition Connections

Associated With

New York, Cities

This source names New York directly: "academic collection drawn from a 1993 New York conference bringing together scholars of Christian, Jewish, Muslim, Buddhist, Indian and Zoroastrian ascetic practice."

Source AsceticismVincent L. Wimbush and Richard Valantasis (eds.)
Claims Backed By This Source (39 claims)

This source backs 39 claims across the atlas. As facts: 26 well-attested. As cited relationships: 10 holds. Plus 3 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.

Disposition By Topic

  • Disciplines, 13 claims: 3 well-attested, 9 holds, 1 general references.
  • Religious Roles & Titles, 9 claims: 8 well-attested, 1 general references.
  • Sources, 9 claims: 8 well-attested, 1 holds.
  • Articles, 4 claims: 4 well-attested.
  • Subcategories, 4 claims: 3 well-attested, 1 general references.
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.