Ann Geneva's 1995 study is the standard modern academic account of William Lilly, the most prominent English astrologer of the seventeenth century, and of the astrological culture that made his almanacs a genuine force in Interregnum political life. Its central argument concerns Lilly's 1651 pamphlet Monarchy or No Monarchy in England, sixteen pages of hieroglyphic woodcuts that Lilly himself described as representing "the future condition of the English Nation" in deliberately obscure form. Two of the images, a burning city and a pair of twins over flames, were read after 1666 as having predicted the Great Fire of London fifteen years in advance. Geneva reads the hieroglyphs as encoded commentary on the political and religious conflicts of 1651 aimed at Lilly's contemporary readers, not as literal foreknowledge of a specific future event, situating the later "prediction" reading as a retrospective one imposed once the Fire had already happened. Use it for the modern scholarly account of what the images most plausibly meant to their first readers.
Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier1
A scholarly monograph in the Social and Cultural Values in Early Modern Europe series, ISBN 0-7190-4154-6, the standard modern academic study of Lilly and English Interregnum astrology. NotesA close reading of Lilly's astrological enciphering, including the 1651 hieroglyphs in Monarchy or No Monarchy in England later read as depicting the Great Plague and the Great Fire of London, argued here as encoded political commentary aimed at Lilly's own civil-war-era audience rather than as literal precognition.
Citation
AuthorAnn Geneva
PublisherManchester University Press, Manchester
Publication Year1995
Source TypeBook (scholarly)
Cross-Tradition Connections
Associated With
Geneva, Cities This source names Geneva directly: "Ann Geneva's 1995 study is the standard modern academic account of William Lilly, the most prominent English astrologer of the seventeenth century, and of the astrological culture that made his..."
London, Cities This source names London directly: "as having predicted the Great Fire of London fifteen years in advance."
Claims Backed By This Source (19 claims)
This source backs 19 claims across the atlas. As facts: 11 well-attested, 2 scholarly debate. As cited relationships: 5 holds. Plus 1 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.
Disposition By Topic
- Prophecies, 10 claims: 4 well-attested, 2 scholarly debate, 3 holds, 1 general references.
- Sources, 9 claims: 7 well-attested, 2 holds.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.
View At A Past Year
The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.