Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sign In
Text size
100%
Theme
Source

The Action Phase of the 1915 Riots

Charles S. Blackton, The Journal of Asian Studies, 1970

Charles Blackton's peer reviewed article reconstructs the course of the 1915 Sinhalese Muslim riots in British Ceylon from official colonial records, tracing how a dispute over a Buddhist religious procession passing a mosque in Kandy escalated over several months into widespread attacks on Muslim owned property across the Central, Western and Sabaragamuwa provinces, and examining the colonial government's martial law response, including its executions and detentions of Sinhalese leaders, several later shown to have been uninvolved in the violence.

Facts
Citation
Author
Charles S. Blackton 1
Publisher
The Journal of Asian Studies, volume 29, issue 2 1
Publication Year
1970 1
Source Type
academic article 1
Assessment
Reliability Tier
1 1
A peer reviewed article in a leading Asian studies journal, built from British colonial administrative and martial law records, and cited as the standard scholarly reconstruction of how the 1915 riots actually unfolded over their several month course.
Connections

Associated With

Sinhalese, Cultures

This source names Sinhalese directly: "reconstructs the course of the 1915 Sinhalese Muslim riots in British Ceylon from official colonial records, tracing how a dispute over a Buddhist religious procession passing a mosque in Kandy..."

Source Divinity Atlas Original Articles, Second Edition
Sources
1. Divinity Atlas Original Articles, Second Edition
Claims Backed By This Source (34 claims)

This source backs 34 claims across the atlas. As facts: 24 well-attested. As cited relationships: 2 holds, 4 connected. Plus 4 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.

Disposition By Topic

  • Articles, 14 claims: 10 well-attested, 2 connected, 2 general references.
  • Wars & Conflicts, 13 claims: 8 well-attested, 2 holds, 2 connected, 1 general references.
  • Open Questions, 7 claims: 6 well-attested, 1 general references.
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.