Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sign In
Text size
100%
Theme
Source

Bona Dea: The Sources and a Description of the Cult

H. H. J. Brouwer's Bona Dea: The Sources and a Description of the Cult is a specialist scholarly monograph systematically assembling the surviving literary, epigraphic and archaeological evidence for the Roman goddess Bona Dea and her exclusively female cult practices, published by Brill in its recognized classical studies series. Its authority rests on comprehensive primary-source compilation, gathering scattered ancient testimony that no single ancient author preserved in full. Because so much of what is known about Bona Dea's rites comes from outsider accounts, notably Cicero's hostile reporting on the Clodius scandal, Brouwer's own study is careful to flag where the ancient evidence itself is fragmentary, secondhand or polemically motivated rather than firsthand description by an initiated participant.

Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier
1
Reliability tier 1: a specialist scholarly monograph systematically assembling the surviving ancient evidence, published in a recognized classical studies series.
Notes
Scholarly study collecting and analyzing the sources for the Roman cult of Bona Dea.
Citation
Author
H. H. J. Brouwer
Publisher
E. J. Brill
Publication Year
1989
Source Type
academic monograph
Connections

Associated With

Bona Dea, Deities

This source names Bona Dea directly: "Brouwer's Bona Dea: The Sources and a Description of the Cult is a specialist scholarly monograph systematically assembling the surviving literary, epigraphic and archaeological evidence for the..."

Source Bona Dea: The Sources and a Description of the CultH. H. J. Brouwer
Claims Backed By This Source (21 claims)

This source backs 21 claims across the atlas. As facts: 14 well-attested, 2 scholarly debate. As cited relationships: 4 holds. Plus 1 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.

Disposition By Topic

  • Deities, 11 claims: 5 well-attested, 2 scholarly debate, 3 holds, 1 general references.
  • Sources, 8 claims: 7 well-attested, 1 holds.
  • Articles, 2 claims: 2 well-attested.
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.