Sources
Book of the Hopi
Citation Formats
General Reference
APA Style
BibTeX
Frank Waters's Book of the Hopi, published by Viking Press in 1963, compiled by a non-Hopi author from interviews with a small number of Hopi collaborators, is the most widely circulated printed source for Hopi prophecy material in general circulation. Its strength is exactly that wide circulation and its role as the most accessible printed account many readers first encounter. Its limit needs to be stated plainly: Hopi scholarship, Peter Whiteley's Rethinking Hopi Ethnography and other specialist work among it, has directly questioned whether a handful of individual collaborators' accounts, filtered through a non-Hopi compiler working outside any process the Hopi community as a whole recognised as authoritative, can represent Hopi religious authority as a whole; the Hopi Tribe has itself never endorsed the book. It is cited for the material it records, not as evidence that the material speaks for Hopi religion generally.
Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier3
Frank Waters's Viking Press book, the most widely circulated printed source for Hopi prophecy material but compiled by a non-Hopi author from a handful of individual collaborators' accounts that the Hopi Tribe has never endorsed, hence the tier reflecting a contested rather than an authoritative account. NotesCompiled by a non-Hopi author from interviews with a small number of Hopi collaborators. The most widely circulated printed source for Hopi prophecy material, and the one Peter Whiteley's Rethinking Hopi Ethnography and other Hopi scholarship have most directly questioned as representative of Hopi religious authority as a whole.
Citation
AuthorFrank Waters, with Oswald "White Bear" Fredericks
PublisherViking Press
New York, 1963 first edition. Publication Year1963
Source TypeBook (contested)
Cross-Tradition Connections
Associated With
This source names Franks directly: "Frank Waters's Book of the Hopi, published by Viking Press in 1963, compiled by a non-Hopi author from interviews with a small number of Hopi collaborators, is the most widely circulated printed..."
Claims Backed By This Source (26 claims)
This source backs 26 claims across the atlas. As facts: 17 well-attested, 1 scholarly debate. As cited relationships: 5 holds. Plus 3 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.
Disposition By Topic
- Prophecies, 8 claims: 5 well-attested, 1 scholarly debate, 1 holds, 1 general references.
- Sources, 8 claims: 7 well-attested, 1 holds.
- Myths & Sacred Narratives, 7 claims: 3 well-attested, 3 holds, 1 general references.
- Articles, 2 claims: 2 well-attested.
- Cultures, 1 claims: 1 general references.
Well-attested
17Myths & Sacred Narratives
Holds
5Myths & Sacred Narratives
General References
3Myths & Sacred Narratives
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.
View At A Past Year
The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.