Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sign In
Text size
100%
Theme
Source

Buddhism in Japan (Wikipedia)

Wikipedia

Wikipedia's article on Buddhism in Japan, community-edited. Reliable for its own account of the 538/552 dating controversy over Buddhism's official introduction from Baekje: the Nihon Shoki's traditional 552 date is now widely doubted by scholars because 552 was chosen to align with the Buddhist doctrine of mappo, the degenerate age, a numerological rather than a historical motive, while 538, drawn from the Gangoji engi and the Jogu Shotoku Hoo teisetsu, is increasingly favored; the article names this as a live scholarly disagreement rather than resolving it. This description is adapted from Wikipedia contributors under CC BY-SA 4.0; changes were made. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/

Facts
Citation
Author
Wikipedia contributors
Publisher
Wikipedia
Publication Year
2026
URL
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buddhism_in_Japan
Source Type
encyclopedia
Assessment
Reliability Tier
3
Community-edited reference page, tier 3, but cited specifically for its own account of a named scholarly dating dispute (538 versus 552) rather than for a settled fact, which is the honest use of a tier-3 source on a contested date.
Notes
Used for the 538/552 dating controversy over Buddhism's official introduction to Japan from Baekje.
Connections

Associated With

Japan, Countries

This source names Japan directly: "Wikipedia's article on Buddhism in Japan, community-edited."

Source Buddhism in Japan (Wikipedia)Wikipedia contributors
Claims Backed By This Source (20 claims)

This source backs 20 claims across the atlas. As facts: 13 well-attested, 1 scholarly debate. As cited relationships: 3 holds, 1 connected. Plus 2 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.

Disposition By Topic

  • Sources, 9 claims: 8 well-attested, 1 holds.
  • Spread Events, 6 claims: 2 well-attested, 1 scholarly debate, 2 holds, 1 general references.
  • Articles, 5 claims: 3 well-attested, 1 connected, 1 general references.
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.