Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sign In
Text size
100%
Theme
Source

Buddhism in Vietnam (Wikipedia)

Wikipedia

Wikipedia's article on Buddhism in Vietnam, community-edited. Reliable for the standard, well documented account of the Indian monks Mahajivaka and Kalacarya arriving at Luy Lau near the end of Han emperor Lingdi's reign; not the right source for the earlier, genuinely disputed theory of direct Indian contact as early as the third century BCE, which the article itself names as a live disagreement rather than a settled fact. This description is adapted from Wikipedia contributors under CC BY-SA 4.0; changes were made. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/

Facts
Citation
Author
Wikipedia contributors
Publisher
Wikipedia
Publication Year
2026
URL
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buddhism_in_Vietnam
Source Type
reference
Assessment
Reliability Tier
3
Community-edited reference page, tier 3. Used for the documented 168 to 189 CE arrival of Mahajivaka and Kalacarya at Luy Lau; the earlier third-to-second century BCE direct-India theory is named in the description as disputed rather than adopted.
Notes
Used for Buddhism's documented early arrival in Vietnam via the Indian monks at Luy Lau.
Connections

Associated With

Vietnam, Countries

This source names Vietnam directly: "Wikipedia's article on Buddhism in Vietnam, community-edited."

Source Buddhism in Vietnam (Wikipedia)Wikipedia contributors
Claims Backed By This Source (24 claims)

This source backs 24 claims across the atlas. As facts: 15 well-attested, 1 scholarly debate. As cited relationships: 5 holds, 1 connected. Plus 2 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.

Disposition By Topic

  • Sources, 9 claims: 8 well-attested, 1 holds.
  • Spread Events, 9 claims: 3 well-attested, 1 scholarly debate, 4 holds, 1 general references.
  • Articles, 6 claims: 4 well-attested, 1 connected, 1 general references.
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.