Edward Conze was a scholar of Buddhist studies and one of the twentieth century's leading translators of Prajnaparamita literature, and this book, published by George Allen and Unwin, presents his scholarly English translations of the Diamond Sutra and the Heart Sutra, two of the most influential Mahayana Buddhist texts, with his own introduction and commentary. Its strength is Conze's deep specialist command of the Sanskrit and Chinese textual tradition behind these sutras, translating directly from the primary sources rather than through an intermediary language. Its limit is its age, later Buddhist studies scholarship has refined some points of translation and interpretation since 1958, so specific technical or philosophical claims benefit from cross checking against more recent translations where precision matters.
Facts
Citation
AuthorEdward Conze
PublisherGeorge Allen and Unwin
Publication Year1958
Source Typeprimary-text
Assessment
Reliability Tier1
Edward Conze's scholarly translation and commentary on the Diamond and Heart sutras. NotesTranslation and commentary on the Vajracchedika (Diamond) and Heart sutras.
Cross-Tradition Connections
Associated With
This source names Prajnaparamita directly: "century's leading translators of Prajnaparamita literature, and this book, published by George Allen and Unwin, presents his scholarly English translations of the Diamond Sutra and the Heart Sutra..."
Claims Backed By This Source (58 claims)
This source backs 58 claims across the atlas. As facts: 27 well-attested, 3 scholarly debate. As cited relationships: 16 holds. Plus 12 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.
Disposition By Topic
- Scriptures & Texts, 16 claims: 6 well-attested, 6 holds, 4 general references.
- Mantras, 11 claims: 7 well-attested, 2 scholarly debate, 1 holds, 1 general references.
- Sources, 8 claims: 7 well-attested, 1 holds.
- Doctrines, 7 claims: 5 holds, 2 general references.
- Articles, 6 claims: 6 well-attested.
- Virtues, 5 claims: 1 well-attested, 1 scholarly debate, 1 holds, 2 general references.
- Denominations, 4 claims: 2 holds, 2 general references.
- Deities, 1 claims: 1 general references.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.
View At A Past Year
The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.