The National Park Service's own record of the Charles Street Meeting House, part of the Boston African American National Historic Site, carries direct institutional authority as the federal agency responsible for the site's historical designation and interpretation. Its limit is that it is a heritage record, not an independent scholarly history of the congregations, Black and white, Baptist and Unitarian, that have used the building across its history, which should be sought in dedicated studies.
Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier1
The National Park Service's own record of the Charles Street Meeting House, part of the Boston African American National Historic Site, the top tier reflecting direct institutional authority as the federal agency responsible for the site's historical designation and interpretation. Its limit is that it is a heritage record, not an independent scholarly history of the congregations, Black and white, Baptist and Unitarian, that have used the building across its history. NotesThe National Park Service's own record of the Charles Street Meeting House at the Boston African American National Historic Site; an institutional heritage record, not independent scholarly analysis.
Citation
PublisherUnited States National Park Service, Boston African American National Historic Site
URLhttps://www.nps.gov/places/charles-street-meeting-house.htm
Source TypeGovernment agency
Connections
Associated With
This source names Baptist directly: "of the congregations, Black and white, Baptist and Unitarian, that have used the building across its history, which should be sought in dedicated studies."
Source Charles Street Meeting House
Boston, Cities This source names Boston directly: "Street Meeting House, part of the Boston African American National Historic Site, carries direct institutional authority as the federal agency responsible for the site's historical designation and..."
Source Charles Street Meeting House
Claims Backed By This Source (12 claims)
This source backs 12 claims across the atlas. As facts: 9 well-attested. As cited relationships: 2 holds. Plus 1 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.
Disposition By Topic
- Sources, 8 claims: 6 well-attested, 2 holds.
- Articles, 4 claims: 3 well-attested, 1 general references.
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.