Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sign In
Text size
100%
Theme
Source

China Daoist Ecology Protection Eight Year Plan (Alliance of Religions and Conservation)

Alliance of Religions and Conservation

The China Daoist Ecology Protection Eight Year Plan itself, approved by the China Daoist Association in 2008 and covering 2010 to 2017, produced with the Alliance of Religions and Conservation and archived by the International Environment Forum, setting out the association's commitments on temple construction, incense burning, resource management and the prohibition of endangered species in Daoist healthcare practice.

Facts
Citation
Publisher
China Daoist Association and Alliance of Religions and Conservation
Publication Year
2008
URL
https://iefworld.org/fl/WindsorARCDaoist_summary091020.pdf
Source Type
organization primary source
Assessment
Reliability Tier
2
The China Daoist Association's own primary planning document, tier 2, corroborating the content of the plan described in the Lemche and Miller academic article above.
Notes
Used for the plan's own stated commitments on incense burning, resource management and endangered species.
Connections

Associated With

China, Countries

This source names China directly: "The China Daoist Ecology Protection Eight Year Plan itself, approved by the China Daoist Association in 2008 and covering 2010 to 2017, produced with the Alliance of Religions and Conservation and..."

Source China Daoist Ecology Protection Eight Year Plan (Alliance of Religions and Conservation)
Claims Backed By This Source (15 claims)

This source backs 15 claims across the atlas. As facts: 11 well-attested. As cited relationships: 1 holds, 1 connected. Plus 2 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.

Disposition By Topic

  • Sources, 8 claims: 7 well-attested, 1 holds.
  • Articles, 6 claims: 4 well-attested, 1 connected, 1 general references.
  • Spread Events, 1 claims: 1 general references.
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.