This entry on the Church of Light, incorporated in 1932, comes from an online implementation of the reference work Encyclopedia of Cults, Sects, and New Religious Movements, a tertiary compilation summarizing new religious movements for general reference use. The underlying facts it reports, that Los Angeles astrologer Elbert Benjamine incorporated the church in response to local ordinances restricting astrology's teaching and practice, and that it traces its lineage to the 1915 Brotherhood of Light, are corroborated by the movement's own institutional history and independent occult-studies reference sources. As a brief encyclopedia entry rather than a monograph, it is useful for orienting basic facts and founding chronology, and a reader wanting deeper treatment of the group's specific astrological teaching system should follow its own published curriculum and independent scholarship on American astrological religion.
Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier2
This Cult Encyclopedia entry is an online implementation of a tertiary reference compilation on new religious movements, the middle tier reflecting a summary reference whose underlying facts are corroborated by the movement's own institutional history rather than a primary or peer reviewed source itself. NotesAn online Encyclopedia of Cults, Sects, and New Religious Movements entry on the Church of Light (1932); a web reference compilation, not a peer-reviewed scholarly source.
Citation
AuthorCult Encyclopedia
Publishercultencyclopedia.com
URLhttps://cultencyclopedia.com/2025/11/19/church-of-light-1932/
Source Typereference
Connections
Associated With
This source names Los Angeles directly: "The underlying facts it reports, that Los Angeles astrologer Elbert Benjamine incorporated the church in response to local ordinances restricting astrology's teaching and practice, and that it..."
Source Church of Light (1932), Encyclopedia of Cults, Sects, and New Religious MovementsCult Encyclopedia
Claims Backed By This Source (19 claims)
This source backs 19 claims across the atlas. As facts: 14 well-attested. As cited relationships: 3 holds. Plus 2 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.
Disposition By Topic
- Sources, 8 claims: 7 well-attested, 1 holds.
- Organizations, 7 claims: 5 well-attested, 1 holds, 1 general references.
- Articles, 2 claims: 2 well-attested.
- Years, 2 claims: 1 holds, 1 general references.
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.