Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sign In
Text size
100%
Theme
Source

'Black Budget' Summary Details U.S. Spy Network's Successes, Failures and Objectives (Washington Post, 2013)

News Report

Washington Post reporting, read 2026-08-22, on the FY2013 US intelligence community 'black budget' leaked by Edward Snowden, breaking out the CIA's requested budget share among sixteen intelligence agencies.

Facts
Citation
Author
Barton Gellman and Greg Miller
Publisher
The Washington Post
Publication Year
2013
URL
https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/black-budget-summary-details-us-spy-networks-successes-failures-and-objectives/2013/08/29/7e57bb78-10ab-11e3-8cdd-bcdc09410972_story.html
Source Type
journalism
Assessment
Reliability Tier
2
Tier 2: The Washington Post, a major national newspaper, reporting from leaked government budget documents rather than an official government disclosure.
Notes
A major national newspaper's reporting on a genuine leaked US government budget document (provided by Edward Snowden); the underlying figures are the government's own, reaching the public through an unauthorized leak rather than routine disclosure.
Connections

Associated With

This source names Washington directly: "Washington Post reporting, read 2026-08-22, on the FY2013 US intelligence community 'black budget' leaked by Edward Snowden, breaking out the CIA's requested budget share among sixteen intelligence..."

Source 'Black Budget' Summary Details U.S. Spy Network's Successes, Failures and Objectives (Washington Post, 2013)Barton Gellman and Greg Miller
Sources
'Black Budget' Summary Details U.S. Spy Network's Successes, Failures and Objectives (Washington Post, 2013)
Barton Gellman and Greg Miller, The Washington Post, 2013View the Source
Claims Backed By This Source (14 claims)

This source backs 14 claims across the atlas. As facts: 12 well-attested. As cited relationships: 1 holds. Plus 1 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.

Disposition By Topic

  • Sources, 9 claims: 8 well-attested, 1 holds.
  • Secular Organizations, 5 claims: 4 well-attested, 1 general references.
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.