Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sources

Classical Samkhya: An Interpretation of Its History and Meaning

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

Gerald Larson's study includes the primary text and translation of Ishvarakrishna's Samkhyakarika alongside his own interpretive history of classical Samkhya, giving direct access to the source text this atlas's claims about the gunas and the tattvas ultimately rest on. This atlas states honestly why the source was added: the corpus held no dedicated Samkhya source at all before this record was created, despite Samkhya categories appearing elsewhere in Hindu philosophy citations. This record has not independently traced further scholarly disagreement with Larson's specific interpretation since 1979. Use it for the textual history and content of classical Samkhya philosophy, including the gunas and tattvas as the Samkhyakarika presents them.

Facts
Citation
Author
Gerald James Larson
Publisher
Motilal Banarsidass
Publication Year
1979
URL
https://archive.org/details/classicalsamkhyasankhyageraldjameslarsonmlbdseeotherbooks_202003_33_y
Source Type
academic monograph
Assessment
Reliability Tier
1
A scholarly study including the primary text and translation of Ishvarakrishna's Samkhyakarika alongside an interpretive history of classical Samkhya, from an academic press.
Notes
The standard study of classical Samkhya, with the text and translation of Ishvarakrishna's Samkhyakarika. Added because the corpus held no Samkhya source, and the gunas and the tattvas are Samkhya doctrine.
Cross-Tradition Connections

Associated With

Samkhya, Denominations

This source names Samkhya directly: "and translation of Ishvarakrishna's Samkhyakarika alongside his own interpretive history of classical Samkhya, giving direct access to the source text this atlas's claims about the gunas and the..."

Claims Backed By This Source (428 claims)

This source backs 428 claims across the atlas. As facts: 257 well-attested. As cited relationships: 84 holds, 23 connected, 1 critiqued Here, 1 held Differently. Plus 62 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.

Disposition By Topic

  • Tattvas, 255 claims: 148 well-attested, 62 holds, 20 connected, 25 general references.
  • Articles, 83 claims: 57 well-attested, 3 connected, 23 general references.
  • Gunas, 33 claims: 27 well-attested, 3 holds, 3 general references.
  • Denominations, 14 claims: 1 well-attested, 10 holds, 1 critiqued Here, 1 held Differently, 1 general references.
  • Beliefs & Restrictions, 11 claims: 8 well-attested, 3 general references.
  • Doctrines, 9 claims: 1 well-attested, 4 holds, 4 general references.
  • Scriptures & Texts, 9 claims: 6 well-attested, 2 holds, 1 general references.
  • Sources, 9 claims: 8 well-attested, 1 holds.
  • Metaphysical Positions, 3 claims: 1 well-attested, 1 holds, 1 general references.
  • Religions, 2 claims: 1 holds, 1 general references.

Well-attested

257

Denominations

Doctrines

Metaphysical Positions

Scriptures & Texts

Showing 1 to 50 of 70 entities carrying this claim. Next

Critiqued Here

1

Denominations

Held Differently

1

Denominations

General References

62

Denominations

Metaphysical Positions

Religions

Scriptures & Texts

Showing 1 to 50 of 62 entities carrying this claim. Next

Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.