Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sources

Clement of Alexandria and a Secret Gospel of Mark

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

Morton Smith's Clement of Alexandria and a Secret Gospel of Mark reports Smith's own 1958 discovery at Mar Saba monastery of a letter attributed to Clement of Alexandria quoting an otherwise unknown expanded version of Mark's Gospel, and this source sits at the center of one of biblical scholarship's most sustained authenticity disputes. For decades the letter's ancient authenticity was broadly accepted even as scholars debated its interpretation, but forensic and stylistic studies since the mid-2000s, notably by Stephen Carlson and Peter Jeffery, have persuaded a growing number of senior scholars, including Bart Ehrman, that Smith himself likely forged the document, a conclusion other specialists, including contributors to Biblical Archaeology Review, continue to dispute. The manuscript itself has since gone missing, which forecloses further direct physical testing, so this source should be presented as a genuinely unresolved forgery controversy, not as an established ancient text.

Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier
1
Morton Smith's report, published by Harvard University Press, is treated at the top tier as academic press scholarship, notwithstanding that it sits at the center of a genuinely unresolved and now widely credited forgery controversy that this row's own description states plainly.
Notes
Smith's scholarly monograph presenting and analyzing the disputed Secret Gospel of Mark attributed to Clement of Alexandria.
Citation
Author
Morton Smith
Publisher
Harvard University Press
Publication Year
1973
URL
https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.4159/harvard.9780674434493/html
Source Type
book
Cross-Tradition Connections

Associated With

Alexandria, Cities

This source names Alexandria directly: "Morton Smith's Clement of Alexandria and a Secret Gospel of Mark reports Smith's own 1958 discovery at Mar Saba monastery of a letter attributed to Clement of Alexandria quoting an otherwise unknown..."

Claims Backed By This Source (16 claims)

This source backs 16 claims across the atlas. As facts: 12 well-attested, 1 scholarly debate. As cited relationships: 1 holds. Plus 2 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.

Disposition By Topic

  • Sources, 9 claims: 8 well-attested, 1 holds.
  • Articles, 3 claims: 3 well-attested.
  • Textual Witnesses, 3 claims: 1 well-attested, 1 scholarly debate, 1 general references.
  • Custodians & Museums, 1 claims: 1 general references.
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.