Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sources

Commentary on True and False Religion

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

Commentarius de vera et falsa religione, Commentary on True and False Religion, is Huldrych Zwingli's own 1525 work, composed in Zurich, in which he set out his reading of Christ's words of institution at the Last Supper and argued against a doctrine of bodily presence in the bread and wine of the eucharist. As Zwingli's own primary text, it is the direct and authoritative source for the Reformed tradition's founding argument on this specific point, in the reformer's own words. Its limit is that it is one side of an active theological controversy of its own time, not a neutral historical account of the wider eucharistic debate among the different Reformation traditions, which this atlas addresses through other sources representing those other positions as well.

Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier
1
Commentarius de vera et falsa religione is Huldrych Zwingli's own 1525 work, composed in Zurich, the top tier reflecting that it is Zwingli's own primary text, direct and authoritative for the Reformed tradition's founding argument in the reformer's own words, notwithstanding that it is one side of an active theological controversy of its own time rather than a neutral account of the wider eucharistic debate.
Notes
Commentarius de vera et falsa religione. The work in which Zwingli set out his reading of the words of institution and his case against a bodily presence in the elements.
Citation
Author
Huldrych Zwingli
Publisher
Zurich
Publication Year
1525
Source Type
primary-text
Cross-Tradition Connections

Associated With

Zurich, Cities

This source names Zurich directly: "Zwingli's own 1525 work, composed in Zurich, in which he set out his reading of Christ's words of institution at the Last Supper and argued against a doctrine of bodily presence in the bread and..."

Source Commentary on True and False ReligionHuldrych Zwingli
Claims Backed By This Source (14 claims)

This source backs 14 claims across the atlas. As facts: 9 well-attested. As cited relationships: 2 holds. Plus 3 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.

Disposition By Topic

  • Sources, 8 claims: 7 well-attested, 1 holds.
  • Beliefs & Restrictions, 3 claims: 1 well-attested, 1 holds, 1 general references.
  • Rituals, 2 claims: 1 well-attested, 1 general references.
  • Cities, 1 claims: 1 general references.

Well-attested

9

Beliefs & Restrictions

Holds

2

Beliefs & Restrictions

General References

3

Beliefs & Restrictions

Cities

Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.