This is the Confucius entry in the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, written by Mark Csikszentmihalyi, a scholar of early Chinese philosophy, published and maintained by the Metaphysics Research Lab at Stanford University. Its authority rests on the Encyclopedia's editorial model, a named specialist author writes a signed entry that is peer reviewed before publication and then kept current through dated substantive revisions, here first published in March 2020 and last substantively revised in May 2024, both dates confirmed directly against the live entry rather than a search summary. It discusses ren and li at length as Confucius's central ethical concepts. Its limit is that as a reference survey it summarizes the field's major readings of Confucius rather than arguing one original thesis, so a claim about one specific classical commentator's interpretation is better checked against that commentary directly.
Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier2
The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy's peer reviewed, continuously revised entry on Confucius, a standard scholarly reference rather than a fixed edition monograph. NotesStanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. First published March 31, 2020; last substantive revision May 2, 2024, author and dates confirmed directly against the entry. Discusses ren and li at length as Confucius's central ethical concepts.
Citation
AuthorMark Csikszentmihalyi
PublisherMetaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University
Publication Year2020
URLhttps://plato.stanford.edu/entries/confucius/
Source Typereference
Cross-Tradition Connections
Associated With
This source names Confucius directly: "This is the Confucius entry in the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, written by Mark Csikszentmihalyi, a scholar of early Chinese philosophy, published and maintained by the Metaphysics Research..."
Claims Backed By This Source (46 claims)
This source backs 46 claims across the atlas. As facts: 24 well-attested, 1 scholarly debate. As cited relationships: 9 holds, 1 connected. Plus 11 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.
Disposition By Topic
- Doctrines, 14 claims: 7 well-attested, 1 scholarly debate, 3 holds, 3 general references.
- Articles, 13 claims: 9 well-attested, 1 connected, 3 general references.
- Virtues, 10 claims: 5 holds, 5 general references.
- Sources, 9 claims: 8 well-attested, 1 holds.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.
View At A Past Year
The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.