Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sources

Confucius (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy entry)

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

This is the Confucius entry in the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, written by Mark Csikszentmihalyi, a scholar of early Chinese philosophy, published and maintained by the Metaphysics Research Lab at Stanford University. Its authority rests on the Encyclopedia's editorial model, a named specialist author writes a signed entry that is peer reviewed before publication and then kept current through dated substantive revisions, here first published in March 2020 and last substantively revised in May 2024, both dates confirmed directly against the live entry rather than a search summary. It discusses ren and li at length as Confucius's central ethical concepts. Its limit is that as a reference survey it summarizes the field's major readings of Confucius rather than arguing one original thesis, so a claim about one specific classical commentator's interpretation is better checked against that commentary directly.

Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier
2
The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy's peer reviewed, continuously revised entry on Confucius, a standard scholarly reference rather than a fixed edition monograph.
Notes
Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. First published March 31, 2020; last substantive revision May 2, 2024, author and dates confirmed directly against the entry. Discusses ren and li at length as Confucius's central ethical concepts.
Citation
Author
Mark Csikszentmihalyi
Publisher
Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University
Publication Year
2020
URL
https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/confucius/
Source Type
reference
Cross-Tradition Connections

Associated With

Confucius, Figures

This source names Confucius directly: "This is the Confucius entry in the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, written by Mark Csikszentmihalyi, a scholar of early Chinese philosophy, published and maintained by the Metaphysics Research..."

Claims Backed By This Source (46 claims)

This source backs 46 claims across the atlas. As facts: 24 well-attested, 1 scholarly debate. As cited relationships: 9 holds, 1 connected. Plus 11 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.

Disposition By Topic

  • Doctrines, 14 claims: 7 well-attested, 1 scholarly debate, 3 holds, 3 general references.
  • Articles, 13 claims: 9 well-attested, 1 connected, 3 general references.
  • Virtues, 10 claims: 5 holds, 5 general references.
  • Sources, 9 claims: 8 well-attested, 1 holds.
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.