Kathryn Rountree is an anthropologist of contemporary Paganism, and this edited academic volume, published by Berghahn Books, brings together specialists studying modern Pagan and native faith revival movements across different European countries, examining how each movement's identity intersects with nationalism and colonial history in its specific national context. Its strength is genuine cross national comparison built from contributors with direct fieldwork in the country they each cover, rather than one outside observer generalizing across all of Europe. Because it is a multi author collection, depth and approach vary chapter to chapter and reflect each contributor's own fieldwork period, so a claim about one specific country's movement should be checked against that chapter rather than the volume as a uniform whole.
Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier1
A scholarly edited comparative volume on European native-faith reconstructions, explicit that these are modern movements, cited here for their dating. NotesComparative scholarship on European native-faith reconstructions; explicit that these are modern movements, which is why it is cited for their dating.
Citation
AuthorKathryn Rountree (ed.)
PublisherBerghahn Books
Publication Year2015
Source TypeEdited volume
Connections
Associated With
This source names Europe directly: "revival movements across different European countries, examining how each movement's identity intersects with nationalism and colonial history in its specific national context."
Source Contemporary Pagan and Native Faith Movements in Europe: Colonialist and Nationalist ImpulsesKathryn Rountree (ed.)
Claims Backed By This Source (91 claims)
This source backs 91 claims across the atlas. As facts: 72 well-attested. As cited relationships: 8 holds. Plus 11 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.
Disposition By Topic
- Religions, 52 claims: 44 well-attested, 3 holds, 5 general references.
- Doctrines, 20 claims: 12 well-attested, 4 holds, 4 general references.
- Articles, 9 claims: 8 well-attested, 1 general references.
- Sources, 8 claims: 7 well-attested, 1 holds.
- Subcategories, 2 claims: 1 well-attested, 1 general references.
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.