Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sources

Contentious Traditions: The Debate on Sati in Colonial India

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

Lata Mani is a scholar of colonial South Asian history, and this University of California Press book is her academic study of the colonial-era debate over sati, ritual widow immolation, in early nineteenth century Bengal. Its strength is a specific and influential argument, that the debate as it actually unfolded was conducted between British officials and Indian male elites over the authority of Hindu scripture and the proper role of the colonial state, with the women who were burned themselves largely marginal to the argument being made in their name. Its limit is that it is a study of this specific colonial Bengali debate and its textual record, so a claim about sati's practice or meaning outside this particular controversy, in another region or period, needs a different, more general source.

Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier
1
A university press study arguing that the colonial debate on sati was conducted over the authority of scripture and the proper role of the colonial state, with the women who burned marginal to that debate.
Notes
Argues that the colonial debate on sati was conducted over the authority of scripture, the nature of Hindu tradition and the proper role of the colonial state, and that the women who burned were marginal to it.
Citation
Author
Lata Mani
Publisher
University of California Press
Publication Year
1998
URL
https://archive.org/details/contentioustradi0000mani
Source Type
academic monograph
Cross-Tradition Connections

Associated With

This source names Mani the Prophet directly: "Lata Mani is a scholar of colonial South Asian history, and this University of California Press book is her academic study of the colonial-era debate over sati, ritual widow immolation, in early..."

Sati, Deities

This source names Sati directly: "study of the colonial-era debate over sati, ritual widow immolation, in early nineteenth century Bengal."

Claims Backed By This Source (45 claims)

This source backs 45 claims across the atlas. As facts: 31 well-attested, 2 scholarly debate, 1 open question. As cited relationships: 4 holds, 1 connected. Plus 6 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.

Disposition By Topic

  • Sources, 10 claims: 8 well-attested, 2 holds.
  • Open Questions, 9 claims: 7 well-attested, 1 connected, 1 general references.
  • Deities, 6 claims: 5 well-attested, 1 general references.
  • Studies, 6 claims: 3 well-attested, 1 scholarly debate, 1 open question, 1 general references.
  • Articles, 5 claims: 5 well-attested.
  • Religious Legal Instruments, 4 claims: 1 well-attested, 1 scholarly debate, 1 holds, 1 general references.
  • Religious Events, 3 claims: 1 well-attested, 1 holds, 1 general references.
  • Empires & Polities, 2 claims: 1 well-attested, 1 general references.

Scholarly debate

2

Religious Legal Instruments

Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.