A citation to the Wikipedia article "Conversion on the Way to Damascus," directly examined. Its strength is a detailed, internally consistent account of the 1600 commission, its contract terms and price, the documented rejection and repainting of the altarpiece, and its 1605 installation. Its limit is that it is a tertiary community reference rather than a specialist Caravaggio monograph, and no official catalogue page for the still in situ altarpiece could be located from the Basilica of Santa Maria del Popolo itself during this pass. This description is adapted from Wikipedia contributors under CC BY-SA 4.0; changes were made. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
Facts
Citation
AuthorWikipedia contributors
PublisherWikipedia
URLhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conversion_on_the_Way_to_Damascus
Source Typereference
Assessment
Reliability Tier3
Bare Wikipedia community article, tier 3, matching this corpus's settled precedent for this source class; no official institutional page for the still in situ altarpiece was found in this pass. Connections
Associated With
This source names Damascus directly: "article "Conversion on the Way to Damascus," directly examined."
Source Wikipedia, "Conversion on the Way to Damascus"Wikipedia contributors
Claims Backed By This Source (35 claims)
This source backs 35 claims across the atlas. As facts: 25 well-attested. As cited relationships: 6 holds. Plus 4 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.
Disposition By Topic
- Sacred Art & Iconography, 20 claims: 13 well-attested, 5 holds, 2 general references.
- Articles, 8 claims: 6 well-attested, 2 general references.
- Sources, 7 claims: 6 well-attested, 1 holds.
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.