Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sign In
Text size
100%
Theme
Source

CRC Vote Overturns Women's Ordination (Christianity Today)

source

An independent evangelical news magazine's contemporary 1994 report on the CRC synod's reversal of an earlier women's ordination decision, one step in the run up to the 1995 local option settlement. Corroborated against the CRC's own account of the 1995 decision and its local option structure (SI).

Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier
3
An independent evangelical news magazine's contemporary 1994 report on the CRC synod's reversal of an earlier women's ordination decision, one step in the run up to the 1995 local option settlement. Corroborated against the CRC's own account of the 1995 decision and its local option structure (SI).
Notes
An independent evangelical news magazine's contemporary 1994 report on the CRC synod's reversal of an earlier women's ordination decision, one step in the run up to the 1995 local option settlement. Corroborated against the CRC's own account of the 1995 decision and its local option structure (SI).
Citation
Publisher
Christianity Today
Publication Year
1994
URL
https://www.christianitytoday.com/ct/1994/august15/4t9052.html
Source Type
news feature
Connections

Associated With

This source names Evangelical directly: "An independent evangelical news magazine's contemporary 1994 report on the CRC synod's reversal of an earlier women's ordination decision, one step in the run up to the 1995 local option settlement."

Source CRC Vote Overturns Women's Ordination (Christianity Today)
Claims Backed By This Source (9 claims)

This source backs 9 claims across the atlas. As facts: 7 well-attested. As cited relationships: 1 holds. Plus 1 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.

Disposition By Topic

  • Sources, 8 claims: 7 well-attested, 1 holds.
  • Articles, 1 claims: 1 general references.
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.