Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sources

Cultural Revolution in Tibet (Wikipedia)

Wikipedia

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

Wikipedia's article on the Cultural Revolution in Tibet, community-edited. Reliable for the standard account of the 1966 ban on the Monlam festival and the decade of suppression that followed; the article itself names a live scholarly dispute over precise destruction figures, the Tibetan government in exile's tally of thousands of monasteries lost against historian Fabienne Jagou's argument that most destruction predates 1966, and this atlas states both positions rather than adopting either as settled.

Facts
Citation
Author
Wikipedia contributors
Publisher
Wikipedia
Publication Year
2026
URL
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cultural_Revolution_in_Tibet
Source Type
reference
Assessment
Reliability Tier
3
Community-edited reference page, tier 3. Used for the 1966 to 1976 suppression of Buddhist practice in Tibet; the article's own named dispute over precise destruction figures is carried into this atlas's description rather than resolved by picking a side.
Notes
Used for the 1966 to 1976 suppression of Buddhist practice in Tibet during the Cultural Revolution.
Claims Backed By This Source (24 claims)

This source backs 24 claims across the atlas. As facts: 16 well-attested, 1 scholarly debate. As cited relationships: 3 holds, 1 connected. Plus 3 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.

Disposition By Topic

  • Sources, 8 claims: 8 well-attested.
  • Spread Events, 8 claims: 3 well-attested, 1 scholarly debate, 3 holds, 1 general references.
  • Articles, 6 claims: 4 well-attested, 1 connected, 1 general references.
  • Religious Events, 2 claims: 1 well-attested, 1 general references.
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.