Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sources

Cur Deus Homo (Why God Became Man)

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

Cur Deus Homo, Why God Became Man, is Anselm of Canterbury's own 1098 treatise and the founding statement of the satisfaction theory of the atonement, arguing that Christ's death satisfies a debt of honor owed to God by human sin. As the primary text it is the correct source for what Anselm himself argued, in the structure and logic he actually used. Its limit is that it records one theologian's own argument, however influential, not a doctrine formally defined by any church council, since no council has ever adopted a single theory of atonement as binding, so a claim treating satisfaction theory as the church's settled position rather than one influential argument among several needs correction against that fact.

Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier
1
Anselm of Canterbury's own 1098 primary treatise, with no modern publisher of record, treated at the top tier as the founding primary text for the argument it makes.
Notes
The founding statement of the satisfaction theory. Cited as evidence of what Anselm argued, not as an account of what the church defined, no council has ever defined a theory of atonement.
Citation
Author
Anselm of Canterbury
Publication Year
1098
Source Type
primary-text
Cross-Tradition Connections

Associated With

This source names Anselm of Canterbury directly: "Cur Deus Homo, Why God Became Man, is Anselm of Canterbury's own 1098 treatise and the founding statement of the satisfaction theory of the atonement, arguing that Christ's death satisfies a debt of..."

Source Cur Deus Homo (Why God Became Man)Anselm of Canterbury
Claims Backed By This Source (23 claims)

This source backs 23 claims across the atlas. As facts: 12 well-attested. As cited relationships: 5 holds. Plus 6 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.

Disposition By Topic

  • Doctrines, 14 claims: 5 well-attested, 4 holds, 5 general references.
  • Sources, 7 claims: 6 well-attested, 1 holds.
  • Figures, 2 claims: 1 well-attested, 1 general references.
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.