Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sign In
Text size
100%
Theme
Source

Curanderismo: Mexican American Folk Healing

Robert T. Trotter II and Juan Antonio Chavira are scholars of medical anthropology, and this University of Georgia Press book is their standard scholarly study of curanderismo, Mexican American folk healing practice, examining its practitioners, methods and place within the communities that use it. Its strength is that it combines academic anthropological method with Chavira's own grounding within the tradition being studied, giving the work both scholarly rigor and genuine access. Its limit is that it documents the practice as observed at the time and place of the authors' fieldwork, so a claim about curanderismo practice in a different region or its more recent evolution needs a more current or geographically matched source.

Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier
1
Published by the University of Georgia Press as an academic ethnographic study of Mexican American folk healing, peer reviewed university press scholarship.
Notes
Scholarly study of curanderismo, Mexican American folk healing practice.
Citation
Author
Robert T. Trotter II and Juan Antonio Chavira
Publisher
University of Georgia Press
Publication Year
1981
Source Type
academic monograph
Connections

Associated With

Georgia, Countries

This source names Georgia directly: "anthropology, and this University of Georgia Press book is their standard scholarly study of curanderismo, Mexican American folk healing practice, examining its practitioners, methods and place..."

Source Curanderismo: Mexican American Folk HealingRobert T. Trotter II and Juan Antonio Chavira
Claims Backed By This Source (50 claims)

This source backs 50 claims across the atlas. As facts: 43 well-attested. As cited relationships: 4 holds. Plus 3 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.

Disposition By Topic

  • Rituals, 26 claims: 21 well-attested, 3 holds, 2 general references.
  • Practices, 10 claims: 9 well-attested, 1 general references.
  • Sources, 8 claims: 7 well-attested, 1 holds.
  • Articles, 6 claims: 6 well-attested.
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.