Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sources

Cybele and Attis: The Myth and the Cult

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

Maarten J. Vermaseren was a scholar of Greco-Roman religion, and this Thames and Hudson book is his standard scholarly study of the myth and cult of Cybele and Attis, the Anatolian mother goddess and her consort whose worship spread across the Roman world. Its strength is that Vermaseren was among the leading specialists of his generation on Roman-era mystery cults, and the book draws on archaeological and literary evidence together. Its limit is its age, the book is now decades old and later scholarship on Roman religion and mystery cults has continued to develop, so a claim about the current state of scholarly interpretation should be checked against more recent work alongside this still-cited standard study.

Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier
1
Published by Thames and Hudson as Maarten J. Vermaseren's scholarly synthesis of the Cybele and Attis cult, written by an established specialist archaeologist of the subject for that publisher's serious academic history list.
Notes
Scholarly study of the myth and cult of Cybele and Attis.
Citation
Author
Maarten J. Vermaseren
Publisher
Thames and Hudson
Publication Year
1977
Source Type
Scholarly work
Cross-Tradition Connections

Associated With

Attis, Deities

This source names Attis directly: "of the myth and cult of Cybele and Attis, the Anatolian mother goddess and her consort whose worship spread across the Roman world."

Source Cybele and Attis: The Myth and the CultMaarten J. Vermaseren
Cybele, Deities

This source names Cybele directly: "study of the myth and cult of Cybele and Attis, the Anatolian mother goddess and her consort whose worship spread across the Roman world."

Source Cybele and Attis: The Myth and the CultMaarten J. Vermaseren
Claims Backed By This Source (40 claims)

This source backs 40 claims across the atlas. As facts: 24 well-attested, 3 scholarly debate. As cited relationships: 9 holds. Plus 4 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.

Disposition By Topic

  • Myths & Sacred Narratives, 14 claims: 8 well-attested, 1 scholarly debate, 4 holds, 1 general references.
  • Deities, 9 claims: 4 well-attested, 2 scholarly debate, 2 holds, 1 general references.
  • Sources, 9 claims: 7 well-attested, 2 holds.
  • Articles, 4 claims: 4 well-attested.
  • Cultures, 2 claims: 1 holds, 1 general references.
  • Religions, 2 claims: 1 well-attested, 1 general references.

Scholarly debate

3

Deities

Myths & Sacred Narratives

Holds

9

Cultures

Deities

Myths & Sacred Narratives

General References

4

Cultures

Deities

Myths & Sacred Narratives

Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.