Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sign In
Text size
100%
Theme
Source

De Re Metallica

Georgius Agricola was a German scholar and mining expert, and De Re Metallica, first published in 1556, is his own comprehensive treatise on mining and metallurgy as practiced in his time, presented here in the standard English translation by Herbert Clark Hoover and Lou Henry Hoover published in 1912. As Agricola's own primary account it is the correct source for what sixteenth century mining and metallurgical practice actually involved, in the words of a contemporary practitioner rather than a later reconstruction. Its limit is that it describes the technical state of the field in Agricola's own sixteenth century Central Europe specifically, so a claim about mining practice in a different period or region needs a source matched to that other context.

Facts
Citation
Author
Georgius Agricola, translated by Herbert Clark Hoover and Lou Henry Hoover (1912)
Publisher
Froben, Basel
Publication Year
1556
URL
https://archive.org/details/deremetallicatra00agri
Source Type
primary-text
Assessment
Reliability Tier
1
De Re Metallica is Agricola's own primary sixteenth century treatise on mining and metallurgy, presented here in the Hoovers' standard scholarly English translation; cited here as that primary text itself.
Notes
Georgius Agricola's own sixteenth century treatise on mining and metallurgy, De Re Metallica, in the standard Hoover translation.
Connections

Associated With

Europe, Continents

This source names Europe directly: "own sixteenth century Central Europe specifically, so a claim about mining practice in a different period or region needs a source matched to that other context."

Source De Re MetallicaGeorgius Agricola, translated by Herbert Clark Hoover and Lou Henry Hoover (1912)
Claims Backed By This Source (33 claims)

This source backs 33 claims across the atlas. As facts: 21 well-attested. As cited relationships: 6 holds, 1 critiqued Here. Plus 5 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.

Disposition By Topic

  • Historical Figures, 9 claims: 8 well-attested, 1 general references.
  • Sources, 9 claims: 8 well-attested, 1 holds.
  • Metals, 8 claims: 5 holds, 3 general references.
  • Articles, 5 claims: 5 well-attested.
  • Disciplines, 2 claims: 1 critiqued Here, 1 general references.
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.