A citation to Wikipedia's article on Den svenska psalmboken (1986). Its strength is detailed, corroborated coverage of the hymnal's approval process, its editorial history and its ecumenical content. Its limit is that a claim about how individual Church of Sweden parishes actually balance the book's traditional and modern hymns in practice, as opposed to its authorized contents, needs a source examining parish level worship practice directly. This description is adapted from Wikipedia contributors under CC BY-SA 4.0; changes were made. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
Facts
Citation
AuthorWikipedia contributors
PublisherWikipedia
Publication Year2026
URLhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Den_svenska_psalmboken_(1986)
Source Typereference
Assessment
Reliability Tier3
A continuously revised, community-edited encyclopedia article rather than an authored or peer reviewed work, matching this corpus's settled precedent for Wikipedia citations, useful for verifiable factual detail rather than as independent scholarly authority. Connections
Associated With
This source names Church of Sweden directly: "Its limit is that a claim about how individual Church of Sweden parishes actually balance the book's traditional and modern hymns in practice, as opposed to its authorized contents, needs a source..."
Source Den Svenska Psalmboken 1986 (Wikipedia)Wikipedia contributors
This source names Sweden directly: "Its limit is that a claim about how individual Church of Sweden parishes actually balance the book's traditional and modern hymns in practice, as opposed to its authorized contents, needs a source..."
Source Den Svenska Psalmboken 1986 (Wikipedia)Wikipedia contributors
Claims Backed By This Source (29 claims)
This source backs 29 claims across the atlas. As facts: 22 well-attested. As cited relationships: 4 holds. Plus 3 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.
Disposition By Topic
- Musical Works, 12 claims: 9 well-attested, 2 holds, 1 general references.
- Sources, 9 claims: 7 well-attested, 2 holds.
- Articles, 8 claims: 6 well-attested, 2 general references.
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.