Marcel Griaule was a French ethnographer whose Dieu d'eau records his mid-twentieth century conversations with the blind Dogon elder Ogotemmeli, presenting an elaborate esoteric Dogon cosmology built around the ancestral beings called the Nommo. Its documentary value is real, it is Griaule's own recorded account and it became enormously influential in shaping how Dogon religion was understood in French and English scholarship for decades afterward. Its limit is the reason for its tier two placement, later fieldwork by Walter van Beek, published as Dogon Restudied and already covered separately in this atlas, found no independent confirmation that ordinary Dogon people held this cosmological system, raising the question of how much of it reflects Ogotemmeli's own esoteric knowledge or Griaule's own construction rather than general Dogon belief, so any claim about Dogon religion drawn from Griaule alone should be checked against that critique.
Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier2
Published by Editions du Chene as Marcel Griaule's own primary account of his Dogon fieldwork interviews; his interpretive method has since been challenged by later ethnographers, so it is placed at the middle tier as a foundational but contested primary ethnographic record. NotesMarcel Griaule's mid-twentieth-century account of his conversations with the Dogon elder Ogotemmeli, presenting an elaborate esoteric Dogon cosmology including the Nommo. Use to document Griaule's own recorded account and its influential place in Dogon ethnography; its reliability is contested, since Walter van Beek's later fieldwork (Dogon Restudied, already scoped in this atlas) found no independent confirmation of this cosmological system among ordinary Dogon informants, so a claim about actual, widespread Dogon belief sourced only to Griaule should be checked against that critique.
Citation
AuthorMarcel Griaule
PublisherEditions du Chene
Publication Year1948
Source TypeEthnography (contested)
Claims Backed By This Source (31 claims)
This source backs 31 claims across the atlas. As facts: 16 well-attested, 1 scholarly debate. As cited relationships: 6 holds. Plus 8 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.
Disposition By Topic
- Sources, 7 claims: 7 well-attested.
- Articles, 5 claims: 5 well-attested.
- Myths & Sacred Narratives, 5 claims: 2 well-attested, 2 holds, 1 general references.
- Cultures, 4 claims: 1 well-attested, 2 holds, 1 general references.
- Deities, 3 claims: 1 holds, 2 general references.
- Fixed Stars, 2 claims: 1 scholarly debate, 1 general references.
- Historical Figures, 2 claims: 1 well-attested, 1 general references.
- Religions, 2 claims: 1 holds, 1 general references.
- Sacred Sites, 1 claims: 1 general references.
Well-attested
16Myths & Sacred Narratives
Holds
6Myths & Sacred Narratives
General References
8Myths & Sacred Narratives
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.
View At A Past Year
The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.