Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sources

Discourse on the Natural Theology of the Chinese

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz's Discourse on the Natural Theology of the Chinese, written in 1716 and first published in 1735, is presented here in the standard modern English translation by Daniel J. Cook and Henry Rosemont Jr., published by University of Hawaii Press in 1994. Its authority as a primary source is Leibniz's own philosophical engagement with Chinese thought via the Jesuit missionary reports available to him, and the translation's authority rests on standard university press scholarly review. It reflects an early eighteenth century European philosopher's reading of Chinese thought at second hand through missionary sources, not a modern sinological account of Chinese philosophy itself.

Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier
1
Leibniz's Discourse on the Natural Theology of the Chinese, in Cook and Rosemont's standard University of Hawaii Press translation, the top tier reflecting Leibniz's own philosophical engagement with Chinese thought via Jesuit missionary reports and the translation's standard university press review. It reflects an early eighteenth century European reading of Chinese thought at second hand, not a modern sinological account.
Notes
Written 1716, first published 1735; cited edition is the standard English translation.
Citation
Author
Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz (Daniel J. Cook and Henry Rosemont Jr., trans.)
Publisher
University of Hawaii Press
Publication Year
1994
Source Type
Book (primary)
Claims Backed By This Source (12 claims)

This source backs 12 claims across the atlas. As facts: 10 well-attested. Plus 2 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.

Disposition By Topic

  • Sources, 7 claims: 7 well-attested.
  • Historical Figures, 4 claims: 2 well-attested, 2 general references.
  • Articles, 1 claims: 1 well-attested.
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.