Carl Young is a historian of modern Korea, and this book was published by an independent university press with no tie to Cheondoism or to the Chondoist Chongu Party in North Korea. It is treated in Korean studies as a standard English-language academic history of the Donghak movement Choe Je-u founded in 1860, its transformation into Cheondogyo under Son Byong-hui in 1905, and the movement's part in Korea's late colonial and independence-era politics, including the March First 1919 movement. The book draws on Korean and Japanese language primary and secondary material rather than on the movement's own devotional literature alone. This record has not independently traced a documented history of scholarly rebuttal to Young's specific historical claims. Use it for the documented history of Donghak and Cheondogyo, its scriptures and its founders; a claim about the present day movement in North Korea needs a source that has independently verified conditions there, which this book does not claim to have done.
Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier1
Independent university press monograph by a historian of modern Korea with no tie to Cheondoism or the Chondoist Chongu Party. NotesStandard academic history of Donghak and Cheondogyo, from Choe Je-u's 1860 founding through the movement's role in Korea's independence era.
Citation
AuthorCarl Young
PublisherUniversity of Hawai'i Press
Publication Year2014
Source Typeacademic monograph
Cross-Tradition Connections
Associated With
This source names North Korea directly: "or to the Chondoist Chongu Party in North Korea."
Claims Backed By This Source (63 claims)
This source backs 63 claims across the atlas. As facts: 50 well-attested, 1 scholarly debate. As cited relationships: 4 holds, 2 connected. Plus 6 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.
Disposition By Topic
- Scriptures & Texts, 21 claims: 17 well-attested, 2 holds, 2 general references.
- Articles, 14 claims: 10 well-attested, 2 connected, 2 general references.
- Historical Figures, 11 claims: 10 well-attested, 1 general references.
- Religions, 9 claims: 6 well-attested, 1 scholarly debate, 1 holds, 1 general references.
- Sources, 8 claims: 7 well-attested, 1 holds.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.
View At A Past Year
The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.