Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sources

Ecstatic Religion: A Study of Shamanism and Spirit Possession, 3rd edition

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

I. M. Lewis was a social anthropologist, and this book, first published in 1971 and reissued here in a third edition, is his influential comparative study treating spirit possession and shamanic trance across many societies as a single analytic field, organized by his own framework of central versus peripheral possession cults tied to social status. Its strength is genuine comparative breadth across a wide ethnographic record. Its limit is important to state plainly: the central and peripheral framework is Lewis's own analytical construction for comparing societies, not a category any of the traditions themselves use, so a claim citing this source should attribute the framework to Lewis's analysis rather than presenting it as the traditions' own self-understanding.

Facts
Citation
Author
I. M. Lewis
Publisher
Routledge
Publication Year
2003
URL
https://www.routledge.com/Ecstatic-Religion-A-Study-of-Shamanism-and-Spirit-Possession/Lewis/p/book/9780415301244
Source Type
academic monograph
Assessment
Reliability Tier
1
Published by Routledge, a leading academic social science press, I. M. Lewis's classic study of shamanism and spirit possession, peer reviewed university-level anthropology.
Notes
First published 1971. The comparative frame for possession and trance as one field, read by social distribution (central versus peripheral cults). The frame is Lewis's own analysis and is cited here as such, not as a category the traditions use.
Claims Backed By This Source (48 claims)

This source backs 48 claims across the atlas. As facts: 35 well-attested, 1 scholarly debate. As cited relationships: 5 holds. Plus 7 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.

Disposition By Topic

  • Mythical Creatures, 14 claims: 7 well-attested, 1 scholarly debate, 5 holds, 1 general references.
  • Articles, 13 claims: 9 well-attested, 4 general references.
  • Practices, 8 claims: 7 well-attested, 1 general references.
  • Sources, 8 claims: 8 well-attested.
  • Subcategories, 5 claims: 4 well-attested, 1 general references.
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.