Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sign In
Text size
100%
Theme
Source

Effortless Action: Wu-wei as Conceptual Metaphor and Spiritual Ideal in Early China

Edward Slingerland's Effortless Action, Wu-wei as Conceptual Metaphor and Spiritual Ideal in Early China, published by Oxford University Press in 2003, is a scholarly study tracing wu-wei, the classical Chinese ideal of effortless, spontaneous right action, across early Confucian, Daoist and other philosophical texts, using cognitive linguistics' conceptual metaphor theory as an analytical framework alongside close textual reading. Slingerland is a specialist in early Chinese thought working at the intersection of philology and cognitive science. Its strength is that it treats wu-wei as a shared problem debated differently across competing early Chinese schools rather than as one tradition's private doctrine. Its limit is that its cognitive-linguistic framework is itself one interpretive approach among several in early China studies, so a claim resting on Slingerland's specific metaphor analysis should be distinguished from more purely philological or historical readings of the same texts.

Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier
1
Edward Slingerland's Effortless Action, Wu-wei as Conceptual Metaphor and Spiritual Ideal in Early China, published by Oxford University Press in 2003, is a peer reviewed scholarly study by a specialist in early Chinese thought, treated at the top tier.
Notes
Edward Slingerland's scholarly study of wu-wei as a conceptual metaphor and spiritual ideal in early China.
Citation
Author
Edward Slingerland
Publisher
Oxford University Press
Publication Year
2003
Source Type
book
Connections

Associated With

China, Countries

This source names China directly: "Metaphor and Spiritual Ideal in Early China, published by Oxford University Press in 2003, is a scholarly study tracing wu-wei, the classical Chinese ideal of effortless, spontaneous right action..."

Source Effortless Action: Wu-wei as Conceptual Metaphor and Spiritual Ideal in Early ChinaEdward Slingerland
Claims Backed By This Source (21 claims)

This source backs 21 claims across the atlas. As facts: 15 well-attested. As cited relationships: 5 holds. Plus 1 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.

Disposition By Topic

  • Doctrines, 11 claims: 6 well-attested, 4 holds, 1 general references.
  • Sources, 8 claims: 7 well-attested, 1 holds.
  • Articles, 2 claims: 2 well-attested.
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.