Sources
Fasti
Citation Formats
General Reference
APA Style
BibTeX
The Fasti is the Roman poet Ovid's own Latin poem on the Roman calendar, composed in the early first century CE, narrating the mythological origins of festivals month by month, and this Loeb Classical Library edition presents the Latin text facing an English translation, the standard scholarly format for classical texts. As Ovid's own poem it is the correct primary source for how Roman festival mythology was told in his own literary rendering. Its limit is twofold, the surviving text covers only January through June, the second half was apparently never completed or is lost, and Ovid was a court poet writing with his own poetic and political purposes under Augustus, so a claim needing a neutral ritual manual account of a festival should be checked against an epigraphic or antiquarian source alongside Ovid's literary version.
Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier1
Ovid's Latin poem on the Roman calendar, composed in the early first century CE, narrating the mythological origins of festivals month by month; the surviving text covers only January through June. Read here in the Loeb Classical Library's scholarly critical translation, the same series and publisher already carrying this corpus's tier one primary texts such as Plutarch's Moralia, so it sits at tier one alongside them rather than at tier two. Use for the content of Roman festival mythology as Ovid presents it; a literary primary source shaped by Ovid's own poetic and political purposes, not a neutral ritual manual. NotesOvid's Latin poem on the Roman calendar, composed in the early first century CE, narrating the mythological origins of festivals month by month; the surviving text covers only January through June. Use for the content of Roman festival mythology as Ovid presents it; a literary primary source shaped by Ovid's own poetic and political purposes, not a neutral ritual manual.
Citation
PublisherLoeb Classical Library
Publication Year1931
URLhttps://archive.org/details/ovid-fasti-loeb
Source Typeprimary-text
Claims Backed By This Source (59 claims)
This source backs 59 claims across the atlas. As facts: 33 well-attested, 2 scholarly debate. As cited relationships: 5 holds, 2 connected. Plus 17 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.
Disposition By Topic
- Articles, 17 claims: 12 well-attested, 2 connected, 3 general references.
- Months of the Year, 13 claims: 3 well-attested, 2 scholarly debate, 3 holds, 5 general references.
- Deities, 8 claims: 6 well-attested, 2 general references.
- Sources, 8 claims: 8 well-attested.
- Artifacts & Relics, 4 claims: 1 well-attested, 1 holds, 2 general references.
- Figures, 3 claims: 2 well-attested, 1 general references.
- Rituals, 3 claims: 1 well-attested, 2 general references.
- Plants, 2 claims: 1 holds, 1 general references.
- Historical Figures, 1 claims: 1 general references.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.
View At A Past Year
The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.